Anonymous, 16 Jul 2017Sadly almost all phones look so similar nowadays, ever since touchscreens took over. However I... moreBack is truly unique and original, but the back doesn't make up the whole design of a phone.
In fact, you'll always look at the front of your phone more than on its back, so the front should look just as unique and as original as its back.
And may I be clear that I'm not a Nokia hater. I do adore every manufacturers because of their efforts, but from the Nokia that I've used to know before, this Nokia is a lot different now.
If they can incorporate a revolutionary design on their upcoming flagship, I'd rate it as one of the best classic designed phone of 2017 along with Xperias with their awesome crafted look.
Anonymous, 16 Jul 2017If we take entire world in consideration it's not even top 5. Maybe 9 or 10....Of course dude...they don't sell their phones worldwide what do u expect. Thats a bad marketing strategy
Bebe Rexha, 15 Jul 2017Phone is nice, but the design is uninspiredly crafted. Literally those phones look as typical... moreSadly almost all phones look so similar nowadays, ever since touchscreens took over. However I disagree that this new Nokia looks very typical. From the back it looks like a Lumia, and according to reviews of the 6 and 3 they 'feel' solid like old Nokias - that's a very promising thing to hear and make them distinguishable. Still, they look WAY more original compared to the latest HTC, Xiaomi, and Pixel phones, which look like iPhone rip-offs. I agree though that Sony are the one making the most original different looking phones now, but luckily Nokia is doing quite well too.
Anonymous, 16 Jul 2017What can we expect from design standpoint when the current technology only allows manufacturer... moreIt's not directly copying Samsung when one makes a device with extremely small bezels and large screen.
Everyone can creatively design a small bezel device, and can potentially look better than Samsung while also being different at the same time.
Creativity and wide imagination are the issues here, or should I say the lack of them.
They don't need to add as such, they just need to craft a device according to their imagination and creativity.
AceShot, 16 Jul 2017low spec high cost so it can make money from people buying the brand.Tell the same to Samsung in this particular price segment.
xXENDER FREAKXx, 16 Jul 2017Well it seems people are getting used to Sony's design. Over here it is 3rd in the top best se... moreIf we take entire world in consideration it's not even top 5. Maybe 9 or 10....
Maroof99, 16 Jul 2017Overpriced trash.. . They're just using brandname to fool people. Yeah especially if your preference is Xiaomi so that's true. Nokia isn't competing to chinese companies that sells at lowest segment and in fact nokia and Xiaomi is in joint venture of patent licensing. Nokia is after Samsung.
Bebe Rexha, 15 Jul 2017Phone is nice, but the design is uninspiredly crafted.
Literally those phones look as typical... moreWhat can we expect from design standpoint when the current technology only allows manufacturers to craft screen on a slab?
Even to put larger screen to body ratio would make everything looks straight copy of S8
Camera layouts being the only thing safe to assume to have many possible variations and nokia did just right other than to exploit the premise of build quality which only be participated by flagship brands.
Designers had unlimited choice to design back then because the use of physical keyboards so it gives much variations to tweak on the aesthetic sense, now there is nothing to be added as such, blackberry is the only brand being creative to add up physical keyboard to standout its design language but guess what, not everyone is into that so we could only deal with it.
low spec high cost so it can make money from people buying the brand.
Bebe Rexha, 16 Jul 2017I used it as an example to my point, and I'm so sorry that you get very offended by my words o... moreDon't worry friend, you said nothing wrong, it was just to make your point as an example.
Peedge, 16 Jul 2017Do a review of the new Vodafone Smart V8.My friend, okay everything can happen, and so I'm not telling you that it is sure. But generally speaking, it's quite rare (not the norm) that someone review those kind of phones. Although I can tell you that as specs it's not bad. But generally if you want the review (or sort of) of that phone, MAYBE you will be lucky enough if you find that kind of review on a Vodafone's site, etc.
Anonymous, 16 Jul 2017Do you really have to bring Sony in here?I used it as an example to my point, and I'm so sorry that you get very offended by my words of that :0
Hmm well, honestly I think that it is a bit too low-end as specs, and even if I do an effort to keep in mind that it costs about just Â€200. But let's say that at least it is quite good for those on a super super budget.
Nokia, 16 Jul 2017All phones look same except for the size. Uninspiring.That is what you call consistency. Back in the days, the Lumia, Asha and other feature phones had the same design language and looked similar. Thats how you differentiate Nokia phones from others.
Anonymous, 16 Jul 2017Very eager to read the full review. Wondering if the camera and battery life is good as there ... moreA5 2017- Rs.26000
J7 2017 - Rs.20500
Nokia 5- rs.12899
J5 2017 - Rs. 19000
Very eager to read the full review. Wondering if the camera and battery life is good as there were issues with the Nokia 3. As the P10 lite and a5 2017 came out a while ago these have now fallen in price and are alot closer in price to the 5. The j5 2017 is out too so the 5 is going to have to be very good to hold its own.
Maroof99, 16 Jul 2017Overpriced trash.. . They're just using brandname to fool people. The article says it's cheaper than it's competitors from Samsung and others so if this is overpriced trash.
1. It wins because you have time to.comment on trash.
2. You are saying the compititors are either more trashy or more overpriced or both. Which makes contradicts with this being overpriced