ImJoaquinTheDog, 28 Jul 2017Phones this cheap shouldn't even exist. Don't some smart watches ship with Snapdragon 200-seri... moreWhy you are against cheap phones? Not everyone has the money to buy even mid range phones
AnonD-404798, 28 Jul 2017they should be ashamed to even make such a phone , snapdragon 212 and storage of 8 GB is unusa... moreWe should be ashamed that android can't even dial numbers without lag on a 212 grade processor with a whopping gb of ram.
Aadrian, 28 Jul 2017Yes Huawei also made a statement saying they will concetrate more on the high-end market and t... more
Well i dont see Nokia do any good phones anymore. They have the old good name for the phone but company is still HMD and they expect to sell the brand from zero with high brand price.
And we cant talk about quality as my last Nokia didnt even last 2 years and now sitting in the guarantee for 2 months by now. I am not a fanboy of Nokia but i have had 90% of my phones only Nokia. 2 smartphones and something 10 buttons phones.
We can talk about quality of Nokia after 2-3 years when they have made market for them selves and see how there devices work and how good quality they have to last over 2 years.
As of right now i see Nokia like the rest of unknown names made in China.
Nevermind, 28 Jul 2017if you have any complains on this phone. just don't buy this phone.. this phone is not for you... moreYes the affordability is the main selling point or it is only segmented to those who need basic stuff. If it Carries 50 USD price tag, it doesn't matter (though it's impossible seeing 3310 2017 is priced this much already) but If it is priced 100 USD, better get another device which offers better value of money(e.g. Xiaomi redmis). Even though you might not noticed or need the features it provides at least you can have more possibilities to explore for the same 100USD priced smartphone you pay
After all it is your money tho and the freedom is in you to choose whatever device you are interested in
Lighting McQueen , 28 Jul 2017Well well the Nokia 2 good for people who have low income but not for the riches. Looks like N... morewhat if they priced it 120$ ????? then also you call it has good mobile ?
Well well the Nokia 2 good for people who have low income but not for the riches. Looks like Nokia is helping out the needy people's from under development countries. Very kind, charming and have the responsibility. Sweet Nokia!!!
definitely buy it as my 2nd daily backup phone..im currently using redmi 4x as my main device
Anonymous, 28 Jul 2017Snapdragon 212? Seriously Nokia?If it cost $70 it's not really a problem.
AnonD-57982, 28 Jul 2017Well said mate. Sometimes someone has something to say on everything. Funny, but you are the someone having always something to say...
Nevermind, 28 Jul 2017if you have any complains on this phone. just don't buy this phone.. this phone is not for you... moreMany people around here forget that buying a phone is a personal choice. They attack other people for having preferences defferent from theirs, and making choices that have zero effect on their lives.
if you have any complains on this phone. just don't buy this phone.. this phone is not for you. this is for those people who cant afford a high end flagship. this phone is for people who have an average income. phones like nokia 2 isn't for you. if you do have plenty of money why bother buying this phone if you have money to buy a high end phone. this phone is for nokia users who can only afford to buy this phone.
Anonymous, 28 Jul 2017sometimes I don't understand why Nokia loves and keep wanting to compete in the low-end market... moreYes Huawei also made a statement saying they will concetrate more on the high-end market and the midrange market, whereas the budget devices make too little money for the company. Maybe people rather buy a cheap Nokia because of brand recognition but I think Huawei made a decision which is very logical.
The combination of a two years old SD 212 + a GB of EMMC RAM to power HD screen is really bad formula in 2017 though they promise "optimization" but we all know how an entry level optimization is, yup! Almost none meanwhile android needs more and more RAM. Even for entry smartphone, it isn't worth 100 USD like the rumour suggests.By the segmented price wise, buyers better get xiaomi redmi 3 or 4 or even 5 families (at least) with better specs + plus fps or lenovo or a local brand smartphone in your country if there's any because it usually costs cheaper
sometimes I don't understand why Nokia loves and keep wanting to compete in the low-end market, or mid-range market. It is going to be difficult with high price to compete with Xiaomi. Huawei definitely made the right choice for not bothering the low-end market. Why not focus more in competing in the high-end market for smartphone?