I love my amoled on my ever faithful HTC A9. It's as good as the day I bought it. I accept colours can look a little saturated at u Joe's u but it's nice. I wondered what the new Nokia flagship will use as I might get it. One report said super LCD and the brightest nits. Guess we will know this week. Whichever way, likely quality.
Anonymous, 11 Aug 2017It should be about quality not the screen type And when the quality is on par between both them smiled comes out ahead objectivity
Anonymous, 13 Aug 2017Amed compr tint from an angle has not improved noticeable over the years, its still unacceptab... moreYou've obviously never seen an amoled at an angle. Or an lcd for that matter.
And clearly you have no knowledge or useful info on the power consumption of said technologies
Anonymous, 13 Aug 2017That is the "cry corner" for Sony fanboysYou do realize in your blind hate all you really said was that Sony fans are a line group to the side that care only for quality.
Which is basically the exact opposite of what happens when it comes to those extremists.
Which are the exact group you thought you were bashing on in the first place...
Anonymous, 13 Aug 2017The only reason why most people voted on AMOLED is that they are brainwashed by the paid revie... moreAnd there are also lcd screens with image persistence on the market.
You're wrong and I'm right...but it's ok. You'll get over it
The only reason why most people voted on AMOLED is that they are brainwashed by the paid reviewers and the marketing.
But in reality, LCD is much better than AMOLED overall.
I have seen several Samsung AMOLED screens burn in after 1-2 years of usage.
TheHeater, 13 Aug 2017People still mistake IPS LCD for Quantum Dot. How funny LMAO.
The latter is a type of IPS LCD... moreEven though samsung pushed the tech to where it is in mobiles for the past 8 years constantly improving it and dwarfing the competing tech.....
Their tech sucks and Sony is superior because after 8 years of advancement their is better type that's been in hard research and development that took years and is not even full on it yet.
But sony us better because when this type is more available sony will use it.
How dare samsung nor be using it. And because they are not their type sucks even though it has been deemed number one every year.
AnonD-2186, 13 Aug 2017For people saying that burn-in doesn't exist anymore on the latest AMOLED, go to samsung store... moreOk. I'll accept this as an issue the day that lcd stops having issues like light bleed, dead pixels, and backlight issues including dying out.
Anonymous, 13 Aug 2017Burn-ins can't be solved due to the nature of AMOLED.
Organic LED will burn.
We need anoth... moreWho says it can't eventually be solved? Or at least to match/ outlast lcd life expectancy?
AnonD-584268, 13 Aug 2017Samsung have crapmoled no OledThis article obviously shows otherwise
Anonymous, 13 Aug 2017Samsung's Amoled has the best color accuracy in every display EVER.It's a fraud.
AnonD-2186, 13 Aug 2017For people saying that burn-in doesn't exist anymore on the latest AMOLED, go to samsung store... moreBurn-ins can't be solved due to the nature of AMOLED.
Organic LED will burn.
We need another screen technology.
Anonymous, 13 Aug 2017Your comment is a joke. AMOLED screens do not burn-in when displaying blacks, because the diod... moreAnd that's pretty much only where AMOLEDs are good at.
But I bet for $1000 that you will only display black contents on your phone for the entirety of your usage to it.
Web browsing is below average to average for AMOLED screens, and I'm not here to defend an inferior display technology.
Truth be said, AMOLED is the superior technology (but not the future), but people who say that AMOLEDs have evolved much, also forgets how IPS LCDs did evolve for years.
My sister currently owns an LG G4 and it has some promising black levels. Promising, that blacks are physically pitch black when set at 0% brightness (unless you have an Eagle eye that can see even the faintest of light).