s4f786, 16 Sep 2017Is have an s8+ and the "carved" is usable, so your statement about that is untrueAre you stupid? They never said it was "unusable". Just hard to measure... Use your eyes (and your brain) next time.
Hey. Did you forget the essential phone? I believe it has a 84.9% screen/body ratio.
On the V30's GSMArena page, it says that it has a screen-to-body ratio of ~81.2%, lower than Mi Mix 2, but here it says that its 83.24%, higher than Mi Mix 2. So which one is correct? It's on the same website =_="
Anonymous, 16 Sep 2017It is less than 84% ... carved screens are not really usable on their edges. They have similar... moreIs have an s8+ and the "carved" is usable, so your statement about that is untrue
kevin97, 14 Sep 2017The Essential, Sharp, LG and Samsung have bottom bezels which the iPhone X does not have. Ther... moreWhere did I mention the S8 or note 8?
I'm talking about the patent that Samsung registered last year in May, well before the other two phone designs were even leaked:
IPhone X has the same design shown in the patent.
As for the essential ph-1, it also has the two 'horns' on either side of the front camera, and that's the design which apple used on iPhone X.
s4f786, 14 Sep 2017the s8+ according to the specs on the site is 84%, which by your own numbers beats all the men... moreIt is less than 84% ... carved screens are not really usable on their edges. They have similar issue to iphone x. The screen js there, shows content, but it is in an inbetween stste between being a bezel and a screen.
Mi Mix 1 is the only phone with ~84% *real* BtS ratio and it is barely mentioned ... I do not understand this...
Actually Mi Mix 1 is the phone with the high body to screen ratio as per your very website: http://www.gsmarena.com/xiaomi_mi_mix-8400.php
Also the only phone that did bezeless right (no weird aspect ratio).
Lagos, 15 Sep 2017LOL sure fanboi why not show the source where ppl did app open testing in nanoseconds?
oh ... moreYeah and you are an ifan so turn around and get your facts straight because the iPhone your talking about is a tasteless and that makes him a little bit faster but the android OEMs are do everything on their phone and wow they are fast because if android was looking tasteless like iOS it would have beat the rotten Apple in their game so with everything android has to me and many many people their faster than Apple.
Apple sells for money and android sells for technology.
Lagos, 15 Sep 2017it's one thing to make physical measurements/comparisons for general knowledge, its another wh... moreLook Sir if you we are talking about the iPhone X, it is cool but no one is talking about iPhone X. We were talking about measuring aspect ratios so the best thing to do is to bring all the bezel less phones and see and show which one is better and have a big aspect ratio and being a neutral when you are a reviewer and a troll just like
Get your facts together because I was talk about the website
so go back to your useless and trolling live.
Have a nice day XD
Anonymous, 15 Sep 2017Yeah. Nano was a bit exaggeration. Just like bezelless iPhone. Then what's the difference; cou... moreBTW YouTube is your friend. Watch c4etech speed test or any one which has less games in lineup and see it for yourself
Lagos, 15 Sep 2017LOL sure fanboi why not show the source where ppl did app open testing in nanoseconds? oh ... moreYeah. Nano was a bit exaggeration. Just like bezelless iPhone. Then what's the difference; couple of seconds?. Never knew CEOs are here on gsma where in a loss of single second means loss of millions of dollars. Also I'd rather be nobody than a sheep
Anonymous, 14 Sep 2017OMG even after 10 years the Apple fan-boys compare phones based on milliseconds in performance... moreLOL sure fanboi why not show the source where ppl did app open testing in nanoseconds?
oh wait....you don't have it, cause you're a nobody, just like your name and social status
KamAbdi, 14 Sep 2017Lol Mr Alright, tell that to the website who measured the aspect ratios and didn't give every ... moreit's one thing to make physical measurements/comparisons for general knowledge, its another when people are commenting about how you shouldn't buy the iPhone X just cause its slightly bigger by 1-2% in screen to body ratios...
LOL but sure bro, whatever rocks your single life
mark, 14 Sep 2017agree with you brother.. Iphone age better than android.. I have a note 3 before but after a ... moremy Iphone 5s is almost dead while my xperia z2 is still running well with no restarts and more than enough battery life, your statement is misleading as it depends on the skin on the top of android and not the android itself
Yes, the iPhone X with its Fail ID is a big disappointment.
You should've added the original Mi Mix, it has a ratio of 84%, as measured by you.
It's clearly better than the Mix 2: no horribly narrow phone with over-streched ratio, battery is 1000 mAh bigger... just the camera is worse.
Oathbreaker, 14 Sep 2017Agree with this buddy, I'm known to clown on Apple fans on here and YouTube. I despised iOS fo... moreagree with you brother.. Iphone age better than android.. I have a note 3 before but after a year it keeps on restarting and overheating is frequently an issue on my note 3.. I have a 5s right now its already 3 years old but still rocking like a new phone..
Oathbreaker, 14 Sep 2017Agree with this buddy, I'm known to clown on Apple fans on here and YouTube. I despised iOS fo... moreman how many what you have 2 + 2 + 2 , 6 or more phone you use all at same time : |
you have record unless you are developer . one ask why you use moto e for gps :S
The iPhone X looks like the more innmersive experience. te top and bottom V30 bezels doesnt looks as good and innmersive.
Lagos, 14 Sep 2017LOL omg even after 10 years, android fanboys still getting triggered & making excuses exce... moreLol Mr Alright, tell that to the website who measured the aspect ratios and didn't give every phone out there a bezel-less his right!!!! otherwise keep quite and stay out of it.