Rumored Snapdragon 635 to use Kryo cores on a 14nm process Comments
- L0lip0p
- tug
Anonymous, 14 Sep 2017What? Do you mean since 630 & 660 are 6 series both are mid-range and both are affordable?... moreThe sd660 and sd8 series had pretty much almost the same cpu performance (around 3/4 the performance of 8 series) but the biggest differentiator is the gpu chip which the sd8 series is much better than the sd660
- Stadtionalist
- 0rk
Merwyn Fernandes, 14 Sep 2017600-645 is also Mid Range ,[615,616,617,625,626,630] and 650-700 are High End [650,652,653,660... moreThe 808 wasn't a midrange SoC. It definitely performed underwhelming, but is was designed to be the more powerefficient over the 810 and definitely better than the 805. (Although, honestly, I preferred the 805 over the 808 any day.)
Anyway, what I'm trying to say is that actual performance of a certain SoC does not define its name/series/etc and naming schemes are prone to changing multiple times (resulting in unlogical branding, followed by a rebrand down the line).
- Anonymous
- PSw
The Snapdragon 635 hasn't even come out yet but I can already see phone manufacturers avoiding it and using SD450 instead, much like how they are using the SD630 now even though the SD660 should've been a better choice.
11721316- Merwyn Fernandes
- D01
Anonymous, 14 Sep 2017Ofcourse!
600 is high end
800 is super highend
400 is middle range
200 is low end.
Not ... more600-645 is also Mid Range ,[615,616,617,625,626,630] and 650-700 are High End [650,652,653,660]
Initially 650 and 652 were And 618 and 620 but since this was confusing and People Couldn't actually differentiate between the high end Midrange Chips And Low End Midrange chips the 650 and above series was started
Technically even the 450 is a midrange Chipset as it almost on par with 625 and the 808 was a midrange chipset.
So your order although correct if you see the series by number but the Categorization is wrong as not all the chip sets in a particular series are either high end ,Mid range or Low end they are Mixed
- Anonymous
- 0UZ
NJ, 14 Sep 2017right and there are still OEM's who still uses SD 200 and 400 chipsets.... =/Nothing wrong with it... if the phone cost 100$ or so.
But asking 300-400$ for a midrange phone that uses SoC of only A53?!? Thats pure travesty,and no feature set can offset that blatant stealing.
- TechLover1
- LfN
Well, that they are preferring to use the SD660 instead of the SD630, obviously it is positive and definitely not negative (haha). Then, regarding the rumoured SD635 to bridge the gap between the two, it is slightly a different story. But basically, no matter what, hopefully the rumoured SD635 will be an excellent performer.
- LG superfan
- sSx
Damn 670 with 10nm process is going to real life saver (battery saver) sd835 phones have good batteries so it will super
- Anonymous
- R5f
What? Do you mean since 630 & 660 are 6 series both are mid-range and both are affordable? What is the gap between 660 and the current 8 series and what is the there to fill the gap?
- Guru India
- gNS
Unfortunately we still don't have many phones using SD 660 or 630...
- Anonymous
- niK
NJ, 14 Sep 2017right and there are still OEM's who still uses SD 200 and 400 chipsets.... =/Ofcourse!
600 is high end
800 is super highend
400 is middle range
200 is low end.
Not all phones can not be highend or we will not have 100-250$ phones...
Tip us
891k
160k 100k
1.3m
RSS
Log in I forgot my password Sign up