Anonymous, 23 Sep 2017They do. It's just software , which needs a polish.Oh right. They did cut money in their R&D to avoid loosing too much money... But I still think it's pathetic when someone else makes more out of your own creation.
Roger, 23 Sep 2017They should really use the average of the scores, it doesnt look to flash for anyone when its ... moreThey should do weighted average based on each individual users scenarios and customise scores accordingly! For example, I may not use too many Bokhe shots as against autofocus prime focus no flash shots in average lighting conditions. I may not use Zoom feature at all while taking shots using mobile phones.
When they are going to add and evaluate the monochrome sensors in dual cameras? Why no make a split ranking between single and doble camera phones?
Oh wait I know when... when Huawei or anyone else pay $$$$$$$ like Apple did lol Your ranking right now has less value than shit for me. Congratulations!
They even don't have enough money or reputation to have latest phones on time.
This is first time they have iPhone's so short after opening - obviously is paid score. And dp not forget that their new so called "mobile protocol" is in favor of one brand - Apple.
People can look real photo comparison.
And ohh... One more thing - I had zoom and bokeh effect on my old but gold Nokia 808 - single core CPU, 512MB RAM, 16GB storage with SD card, NFC, FM transmitter FIVE YEARS AGO!
Still one of the best camera phones on the market, even still unbeatable in some scenes.
Hahaha where's your God now, Sony fanboys? Enjoy being acquired or out of the mobile phone business by next year!
" It did poorly in DxOÂ’s new Zoom and Bokeh tests ..."
You buy a phone with a camera, and expect to have zoom and bokeh? Really!?!?!?
DxOMark has new protocol.. So this score is low don't worry guys.. If they r tested on old protocol.. Im sure sony get 88-87 score..
ProJames, 23 Sep 2017Pathetic when you know they are the provider of Google's Pixel Cameras, Samsung's S and Note (... moreLet's chat bouts Sony's strategy,,
since obviously it's working where most peeps do not see it!
Pathetic when you know they are the provider of Google's Pixel Cameras, Samsung's S and Note (Excluding N8 which uses ISOCELL in-house cameras) and much more. I mean, can't you also have your best components in your own devices?
Anonymous, 23 Sep 2017So you think zoom is an effect? Did you know that even the first xperias were advertised with,... moreCertainly not. But zoom doesn't equal picture quality. What is your thought about fixed zoom DSLR lens?
Mike, 23 Sep 2017Because Sony is a Kind company, and no need to competite to other flagships. Sony just want to... moreIf that is true, they should at least not cost the same as the phones with the best cameras available, how bout that?
MKL, 23 Sep 2017Name of the joke is DxOMark. They are considering some stupid effects (bokeh or zoom) over pic... moreSo you think zoom is an effect? Did you know that even the first xperias were advertised with, for example "5x digital zoom"? Now it has 2x optical zoom and somehow, the android fraction thinks that zoom is useless. There already were a few situations with my iPhone 7 where I thought "yeah, I could have used some optical zoom"
They should really use the average of the scores, it doesnt look to flash for anyone when its the average
People are mad that XZP got 83 while ip8 got 92, just throw away those bokeh and zoom scores and recount it again by yourself! Even s6 got 82 (it used to be 86) after the new protocol, so think just how 83 means if it was tested using the old one? Yup it could be 87, the same score as XZ!
Still low compare to another flagship? It means they still need to improve their camera a lot,both hardware and software!
While the flagship's camera has been very good nowadays you can never go wrong to choose one of them but still improvement is a must!