Rock, 04 Oct 2017So , phones are getting higher scores then full frame cameras . Does that mean smartphones ca... moreProfessional cameras take flat photos for later edit...phones take the best looking photos possible for instant social media post...you can't compare one to the other, they are different worlds
It's still very highly fishy when DxOmark publishes their "rigorous test", just minutes after the phone is unveiled.
Still the Pixel now has a Dual-Pixel sensor, OIS and f/1.8 aperture and judging by the performance of the original Pixel, this might well be the new king of photography.
An enticing shootout with the Note8, V30, iPhone X, Mate 10, XZ Premium & the U11 awaits.
BTW, the 99 points for photo isn't unrivalled. The Note8 got 100 points. It's in video where the Pixel 2 sets the record.
bharcooldude, 04 Oct 2017I think smartphone cameras have reached to a point where a couple of points in difference in o... moreFinally.. Meaningful comments on gsma.. I'd go with the note 8,just cos I'm used to the edge.. But my s7 edge is still running fine and i don't really see a need to upgrade this year.. Another problem is that Google pixels and iphones are priced at ridiculous rates after taxes and duties
So , phones are getting higher scores then full frame cameras .
Does that mean smartphones can take better photos then Pro Cameras .
Anonymous, 04 Oct 2017Dx0Mark have sold out as far as their mobile ratings are concerned. Totally meaningless.Please explain and enlighten our mind.
I think smartphone cameras have reached to a point where a couple of points in difference in objective evaluation doesn't matter at all. This can very well be considered well within margin of error in statistics. So yeah go ahead with Pixel or Samsung or iphone, all of them would do the job for you pretty well. I personally prefer Pixel as their software processing is unparalleled. This is evidenced by how much they can achieve using a single lens. That's pretty awesome, and it also means I can get those benefits updated with new features over time (if google decides to push them).
I saw the their review ...every photos of Pixel 2 got noise.....specially in low in low light it got tons of noise...when i saw Dxo mark gave it 98 i thought they used their seeinthedark computing algorithm but disappoint completely. unlike apple 8...i am not apple fan boy.....back side is fking ugly...and price 849 r u kidding me
Dx0Mark have sold out as far as their mobile ratings are concerned.