AnonD-145316, 17 Oct 2017Just sit back and proof read what you have written and you will realize how stupid you sound!!!Not more than you posting a lame comment about a typo!
AnonD-145316, 17 Oct 2017Just sit back and proof read what you have written and you will realize how stupid you sound!!!Not more than you posting a comment about a typo!
for the first time ever
the pro version sucks
A bit disappointed about the screen on Mate10 Pro but it acceptable for OLED screen and over all especially, the design would makes me want to own it.
A buy call for me as it hits my target list.
Althought 4.2 bluetooth is a little let down, well i barely use the headphone, mate10 pro is what i want.
112% NTSC ?
Not DCI-P3 ?
The still have small black bezel in screen
No im not buying it
Still black bezel?
OLED screen with 400ppi? It'll look worse than the screen on the regular Mate 10. The regular version is easily better than its brothers. Huawei have no idea what they are doing.
For €800 interesting but I better spend it to samsung note8. You got A.I. Bixby, & the stylus.
Anonymous, 17 Oct 2017How is a QHD screen essential? Do you VR on your phone? Because if you don't I doubt you could... moreSD 835 a handicap? Wth
Also it's costing twice the price of mi mix 2 so it better be worth twice (8-900 euro vs 450-500)
Still no 3.5 mm jack.
Ip67 and better cameras are kinda the only advantages it has over mix 2 which I'd expect given the 400 euro markup
And pentile 1080p over a 6 inch 800 euro device? Really what year is it, 2014? I'd take IPS over that. Qhd would be different case though
Have to agree though Kirin is awesome chipset here
Very nice desing or features but price is so high .
The vanilla Mate 10 is a great device & easily better than the other Pro & Porsche Design versions (More screen area, QHD vs FHD+,16:9 ratio and front fingerprint scanner and still a better Screen to body ratio than the others, 3.5 mm headphone jack and SD card slot and still much less expensive).
The only things better in the Pro & Porsche Design are more RAM/storage, IP67 protection and the AMOLED screen.
The other goodies such as the impressive front and back camera, the 4000 mAh, the promising Kirin 970 and the Infrared Blaster remain the same for the trio.
AnonD-392500, 17 Oct 2017Think 10 times before tou buy. Huawei phones are very weak in signal reception.u completely false ! I have best signal I ever had
AnonD-392500, 17 Oct 2017Think 10 times before tou buy. Huawei phones are very weak in signal reception.it's not true, it's a bs. They are wonderful and the signal strength is fantastic
AnonD-120468, 16 Oct 2017Galaxy S8 and S8+ owners said the same thing. Then Samsung added 2 more gb RAM and the differe... moreFor everybody 4GB phones are slower.
If you are bottlenecked due to some hardware it is not "enough"... when O read people using the word enough in situations where there is a bottleneck I honestly have to question their understanding of enough in the context of computers. Because it is honestly an empty word the way they use it.
Enough is a 8 core cpu insituation where no more than 4 threads are used (for example). It is *not* enough to have an 8 core cpu in a situation where 8+ threads are used frequently.
Even the average user uses at least 4gb of ram during the course of a week... it is impossible to be "enough" due to the way android is built.
AnonD-392500, 17 Oct 2017Think 10 times before tou buy. Huawei phones are very weak in signal reception.It´s quite the opposite.....
AnonD-598677, 17 Oct 2017people say iphone, samsung and other phone suck in telco line signal, maybe i should try huawe... moreThink 10 times before tou buy. Huawei phones are very weak in signal reception.
1400€ for a chinese phone with ugly UI??? I wonder who will buy this phone?
What I find annoying about all these Galaxy S8 + clones is the fact that the bezels at the bottom are still big enough to have a slightly smaller finger print sensor instead of one on the back.The Mate 10's bottom bezel has one and The Mate 10 pro might as well have because the bottom bezel looks only a few millimetres smaller.Until a manufacture can come up with a true full screen Android Phone why not put that chunky bottom bezel to good use.The only Phone that really needs a sensor on the back is the iPhone x and they didn't.lol