i have no problems with the resolution density of the pro as long as they dont use a pentile arrangement which will further deplete the ppi.
Anonymous, 16 Oct 2017Battery life should be far better on the pro though. 4k + amoled + 10nm. Do battery test gsm!Pro is Full HD+, not 4K+
112% NTSC...
What does this mean?
performance will be better on the pro because it has less pixels to cope with
Prefer the pro, performance over resolution any day
Battery life should be far better on the pro though. 4k + amoled + 10nm. Do battery test gsm!
To be honest, I like the Mate 10 better. It doesn't seem to have any compromises besides the lack of an AMOLED screen. 16:9 is better anyway. And it has the same 4000 mAh battery, which is great.
16:9 aspect ratio yields 81.7% screen to body ratio, while 18:9 aspect ratio yields 80% ratio??!!!!!!!!!!
What was the point of having 18:9 then? I thank Huawei for showing others that small bezels can be done in 16:9 ratio. And I scold them for removing headphone jack unnecessarily just for the sake of doing it.
Tip us
1.9m 150k
RSS
EV
Merch
Log in I forgot my password Sign up