Good to see GSMArena staff respond to their emails, as I read the review hours ago.
People shouldn't focus on the Dx0 Score, and not even the sub-scores.
You need to actually see the sample photos and read the review writing.
The writing gives you more information, detail, insight and objectivity than the figures.
Just a heads up to people (especially those commenting here) to NOT judge Dx0Mark prematurely without doing your due diligence and reading the full-review properly.
GSMarena Test showed;
- Mate 10 Pro is just ONLY slightly better, if not equal to Mate 9.
- DXO gives
Mate 10 Pro ----98
This means DXO = JOKE = They are funded by Amazon (which owns them) to increase sales .
Did they test it with retail unit? If not then they are blind and paid
But the pixel did a 98 score with one lens. How does that factor in?
In DxO probably they used the $$$ sensor ; ) But sure that are good ones, or should at that price. Good for those that choose to buy this model and the Mate 10 too.
I wonder if this improves over time with the built in AI? And also on the retail version. Good job Huawei.