the 1200 nits is only when the screen shows small portion, if it's displaying full screen images, it's below the X.
[deleted post]Nah, man. It's true. The screen on this XZP is beautiful indeed
This is all I can say:
Congratulations to SAMSUNG for making the best hardware for the iPhone X AMOLED screen...
Congratulations to APPLE for their excellent software calibration to have the hardware the Best out of it...
Wow. This year the pixel and the X are beating Samsung flagships in their own game. I tell you there is already a revolutionary s9 In the making. We know what Samsung is capable of achieving after a failure.
XXX13, 07 Nov 2017How on Earth did Samsung make a panel for the iPhone X with the the highest score and their sm... moreEvery OEM can add own tech to the screens.
Also the adjust as the waybthey want.
Colour, brightness, contrast etc...
OP5, A7 2016 and Z Play must share same screen.
Results are different.
and here we go again everytime iphone x got good rating scores android people will start complaining blah blah blah its paid blah blah blah.. Why don't you accept the fact that apple is good in calibrating their screens.. and base on the article it was stated that Samsung supply apple with their good amoled but apple perfected their screen calibration so whay keep complaining? hahahaha so much hatred huh
there was a saying "IT DOESNT MATTER WHO DID FIRST BUT WHO DID IT RIGHT"
ProJames, 07 Nov 2017Uh... The Note 8 had a 1200 nits/2 nits display no? So DisplayMate is DxO Marl for Display (TM... moreThis has been explained over and over again in the comments already. Try reading them ;)
I admire how Apple costumize the screen, makes better even better.
Good job Apple, waiting for GSMArena's test, and i hope Samsung learn from Apple how to calibrate display rightly! (Especialy the high gamma on Samsung's smartphone display)
How on Earth did Samsung make a panel for the iPhone X with the the highest score and their smartphone score way below the iPhone X????
[deleted post]Microsoft Lumia 950xl had the most bright and accurate display but it was cancelled.
Review places all showed it at 705 max auto nits. Of course displaymate ignored it.
Why am I not surprise, as long as it's the fruit logo. They'll say it's the most accurate blah blah blah. Everyone else is just second.
AnonD-582357, 07 Nov 2017Really? Since when you became an investigative agent? You don't even have a proof of your alle... moreTo TAN TRA:
I'm just tired of the biased reportings. I can't forget a comparative article between a Galaxy S and an iPhone and even though the iPhone was thicker in dimensions than the Galaxy S the reporter said the iPhone is so and so (higher value) and the Galaxy S is so and so (lower value) 'THICK'. The word 'THICK' should have been stated for the iPhone seeing that the said reviewer listed the dimensions for both phones in the same breath.
A lot of commentors bashed that reporter dog scorn for being biased.
Uh... The Note 8 had a 1200 nits/2 nits display no? So DisplayMate is DxO Marl for Display (TM). Unreliable, fake and easily bought.
Ivica, 07 Nov 2017You drop and crack that screen you will need to shed at least $500 which is almost 50% of orig... moreYour right. But who would drop this expensive phone? Also you can protect your device with phone cases. So everything has a solution.