sa11oum, 22 Nov 2017They look the same. Just watch the damned video before saying nonsenseSo would you confuse between who is the mother and who is the child, if mugshots (without the hair and rest of the body) were shown to you? Because that has to be the definition of looking the 'same', right?
If you would not confuse between the two, and the phone did, then this tech is not ready for primetime
AnonD-696542, 16 Nov 2017Very senseless comment, they could bring it but DNA isn't secure, DNA matches among family mem... moreOh sorry for my senseless comment I didn’t know that. Thanks for enlightening!
sa11oum, 18 Nov 2017If you're unable to raise your children not to steal from you, that's not Apple's problem. Fac... more"the same"?
Did the mother and child look the same? In which universe?
You guys have built Apple into the most profitable company in the world...like Trump's supporters have made him the President.
Anonymous, 16 Nov 2017So then my sons/daughters/siblings can unlock my phone/pay for anything using FaceID just beca... moreIf you're unable to raise your children not to steal from you, that's not Apple's problem. Face ID works fine. If two people look the same, of course it's going to fail. That's not a surprise or something we didn't expect, since the thing recognizes your face. If two faces look the same, it'll be bypassed
Anonymous, 16 Nov 2017Apple seems to be on a roll with taking away useful features, in exchange for inferior gimmick... moreSteve did many great jobs with iPhone, his design was excellent, and really coming from the angle of user experience. But it's not the case now under Tim's management. All the "so-called" innovations like, removing 3.5mm phone jack, removing home button and fingerprint scanner are actually creating problem to users. I am thinking what would iPhone X looks like if Steve is still around..
They say he looks more like his father? Well he is already the spitting image of his mother
I(diot)Phone Hater, 16 Nov 2017I agree fingerprint scanner is in the wrong place, but not the others. Get your info correct n... moreHaha. Fake new? Sure, if believing that makes you sleep better... But the fact remains, has been tricked.
Anonymous, 16 Nov 2017You might want to Google that. Yes, it had been tricked:
https://www.google.se/amp/s/www.cnet... moreI agree fingerprint scanner is in the wrong place, but not the others. Get your info correct not based on fake news.
FaceID components is a challenging to build in into a smartphone, the space is so narrow and the benefit is too small, even a well fingerprints scanner can perform perfectly than FaceID, I really don't what is this trends if it create so many problems.
If the FaceID components replace a subwoofer that's must be great for party!
It was gimmick from the start and it is now, you really need to be naive to think that fingerprint scanner is not secure enough and face ID is better solution for now
Don't worry, next year apple will launch iPhone with touchid to improve accuracy of faceID. And of course they increase the price too.
Kane, 16 Nov 2017Iris scanner fooled by picture?? Whoaaaa apple surely ate your brainYou might want to Google that. Yes, it had been tricked:
The key question is: whether the fingerprint reader or iris scanner would have failed under the same circumstances. If not, the removing / not providing iris and fingerprint scanner as an option is not the right thing to do on Apple's part.
...her son is genius. He added his face on her mother's phone.
ethereal, 16 Nov 2017They should have the DNA scanner if they really want to be the most secured! Very senseless comment, they could bring it but DNA isn't secure, DNA matches among family members. And measuring DNA doesn't make sense, they aren't supposed to match if your baby is yours or not.
Apple seems to be on a roll with taking away useful features, in exchange for inferior gimmicks. First with the headphone jack, and now the fingerprint scanner. I prefer to stick with companies that are preserving useful features like Samsung.