LG superfan, 24 Nov 2017Best position is I say side like sony and back is just as convienent as front and its more of ... moreI'm fine with the sensor positioned on the top, bottom, or even a f**king corner. Anything is better than Samsungs "beside the camera design". Why does they have such bad design decisions? - first the dual curves and now the fingerprint sensor.
Just to let you guys know, they decided to launch with 7.1 because it do not want to support project treble. Check it out on their official forum...
The-Artist, 24 Nov 2017Apple is the trend setter in the industry, whether you accept it or deny it. Why before the iP... moreBest position is I say side like sony and back is just as convienent as front and its more of a personal preference
Its useless without 3D mapping technology like iphone X I say the best way to secure your phone is iris scanner more manufacturers should use it, its secure and fast though not as fast as fingerprint
Apple is the trend setter in the industry, whether you accept it or deny it. Why before the iPhone X, you didn't see any other company promoting facial recognition as an unlocking method. It's not just useless without the TrueDepth sensor but also inconvenient. Fingerprint on front mounted is most convenient way to unlock your phone. Just because of useless tall devices (18:9 Ratio) manufacturers are forced to relocate the fingerprint sensor to the back, which although convenient isn't as good as front mounted fingerprint sensors.