ashok, 09 Dec 2017Looks like sony alone is not paying for anything, cant believe the low score of XZ premium. Same for LG
Anonym, 09 Dec 2017They didn't test the Mi6, so your point is what exactly?Mi6 I own one and I say you the camera is not good.For a example, my galaxy note 4 (2014) have a better camera than the mi6
This obsession with DxOMark scores is ridiculous. Anything above 80 is good enough, period.
Anonymous, 09 Dec 2017I agree. Dxomark has lost so much credibility with phone buyers so much so that they have to p... moreIf they are anything like the subsidiary OnePlus, the dot pattern along with other oddities (with anything other than the stock camera) should really throw them down in any serious review.
Who am I kidding, DxO couldn't care less for a fundamentally broken camera API as long as the stock camera hides the artifacts.
The amount of unsubstantiated accusations here is staggering. I see no receipts, no video evidence, nothing. Nice.
P11 does beat itself Chinese bro (triple lenses/40MP)
Why all the hate? Just because its xiaomi? A small player company in android phone industry? Why there isnt so much hate when apple and sammy get good numbers? Effing libs, cant handle the truth. Get a life people, theres more into living than just cellphone.
Just because a few dollars, totally smell of paid xD
Hey i want to go check the detail about this. But for some reason i can't open it, the site is error. Anybody has this issue?
Looks like sony alone is not paying for anything, cant believe the low score of XZ premium.
Anonymous, 09 Dec 2017They used to take pics of same scenes, so we could compare phones. Now every phone is a diff... moreG6 has tiny sensor and colir reproduction issues. Photos in street shadows shows unnatural sky. Huge noice levels. Etc etc etc. G6 has not that bad camera, just very cheap.
and in other news, DxOMarks takes money from Xiaomi
Kyo, 08 Dec 2017I would prefer more megapixels with big size pixels over optical zoom.Oh Nokia please make ano... moreYes, the Nokia 1020 was a great phone. It's photos are better in some ways than today's market leaders and the phone itself was made of tough and practical plastic, not glass, not aluminum. Nokia perfected plastic for phones, but Apple made aluminum the "premium" product. Sad.
AnonD-456831, 08 Dec 2017What!!!!? I have it. Sure it takes great shots. But not even close to iPhone 7. That's right. ... moreBut the photo score of mi note 3 is higher than iphone 8 in DXOmark.. so you are either implying you know better than Dxo experts or Xiaomi can pay more than apple to DXO just for exaggerating the score.. which one is it?
When will we see a review of this phone, gsmarena?
94? It means this phone takes pictures as good as the 93 iPhone 8? Can someone who owns both devices confirm this?