stobs, 13 Dec 2017"However, the company continues to keep mum on more deeper issues on the platform surrounding ... moreI was with you until you started talking about hypocrisy.
Why cannot somebody be against a law that discriminates poor people even though this person is not poor.
I found it great and an example to follow.
Twitter is pure evil, it's irrelevant.
wow that is so great it will be more comfortable for me to use twitter now on I love
twitDM!_PDT_ter so much..
"However, the company continues to keep mum on more deeper issues on the platform surrounding targeted harassment, hate speech, spambots"
- all these come under the purview of freedom of speech anyway. targeted harassment & hate speech are not limited to one set of group only. even 'intellectuals' can gang up on an unsuspecting decent-speaking person and hound them away in a 'posh' manner without swear words or threats.
this is a hidden type of harassment. how would you identify this 'posh' harassment?
twitter is full of posers and virtue signallers. i saw a tweet on lyft saying their new app-based bus system is elitist and can't be accessed by poor people without phones and is therefore bad - but duh, you choose to type that tweet from a laptop or phone which can't be purchased by the poor as you said (and was manufactured in harsh work conditions in china) while sitting in a private room (maybe temperature controlled) wearing clothes poor can't afford on a website poor can't afford to waste their time on - isn't that elitist too? essentially, its my money and my choice, isn't it?
social media is full of geniuses