Samsung Galaxy S9 with Exynos 9810 arrives on Geekbench Comments
- Shadocx
- 33D
That's a beautiful score compared to the Snapdragon 845, but how efficient will the Exynos 9810 be and will it throttle?
- TechLover1
- LfN
Ohh, it is definitely a good news (even excellent). On the contrary, there's the bad news as well of the just 4GB RAM (by just- I mean for the acclaimed best android phone & price, while Chinese, etc., already include 8GB & soon even 10). Samsung as claimed the best phone maker in/of the globe definitely MUST include minimum 6GB in both- standard S9 & +, and with an optional 8GB version/ variant. But on the brighter side (to talk positively), the fantastic scores (single & multi) are definitely a good news. Obviously, looking forward...
- AnonD-737213
- 3HI
You can already tell that this had to be throttled to match snapdragon in multi core and single core, so in reality it should be much, much higher than this.
- AlienFromNextDoor
- JK1
Now you can post that selfie in the bathroom 0.0000001 secs faster.
- Shadocx
- 33D
Petr, 13 Feb 2018The Geekbench methodology changed. You cannot compare directly. It would require to retest the old.https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/7014385
https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/6974531
- Vegetaholic
- nIb
Azaam, 13 Feb 2018And sadly,, in real life it opens even simple apps slower than SD820, 3 year old processor. ... moreLol, who cares if it will open program few milliseconds later, most important is soc performance on heavy games and task, which beastly A chipsets miles ahead of any android chipsets, until now at least, exynos 9810 is absolute beast, well slower than A11 but closer than ever to apple performance levels.
- Edupz
- 7qf
AnonD-632062, 13 Feb 2018LOL, 8895 is the multi-core benchmark....Anyone else see the weird coincidence?? Exynos 8895?! :PI thought Jedi wouldn't mix up 8894 and 8895.
- Vegetaholic
- nIb
Absolutely impressive at last. Close to A11 performance and obliterates 845 in single core performance. True Android soc king, hail fastest ever android soc in years, kudos for Samsung
- Anonymous
- I8m
Dude, 13 Feb 2018Sadly the new Iphones still rape Sammy soc wise...And who cares. As well as slight edge is not that much
- Sonu4678
- PT@
Petr, 13 Feb 2018The Geekbench methodology changed. You cannot compare directly. It would require to retest the old.Even if that is the case, things shouldn't change that much. I hope it is that powerful.
- Azaam
- waW
Dude, 13 Feb 2018Sadly the new Iphones still rape Sammy soc wise...And sadly,, in real life it opens even simple apps slower than SD820, 3 year old processor.
iphone scores only in geekbench.
Iphone wins only in opening large games.
- Petr
- CSK
Sonu4678, 13 Feb 2018OMG!!! Is this for real? I didn't believe it first when i read the rumor of its double single ... moreThe Geekbench methodology changed. You cannot compare directly. It would require to retest the old.
- Anonymous
- dWg
Good if these scores are true.
I mean, Snapdragon 845's A75-based cores post a thousand points less in single score and I didn't expect from the Samsung to thrive.
- Shadocx
- 33D
AnonD-632062, 13 Feb 2018LOL, 8895 is the multi-core benchmark....Anyone else see the weird coincidence?? Exynos 8895?! :PI read 8894, do I need glasses? wait, I already have!
- AnonD-632062
- 3Ye
LOL, 8895 is the multi-core benchmark....Anyone else see the weird coincidence??
Exynos 8895?! :P
- Sonu4678
- PT@
OMG!!! Is this for real? I didn't believe it first when i read the rumor of its double single core score. Lets hope it's not fake. Good job Samsung!!
Tip us
881k
145k 87k
558k
RSS
Log in I forgot my password Sign up