Bagawat, 16 Feb 2018Motorola is lagging from Redmi, as Redmi Note5 Pro is with Snapdragon 636 Chipset. This was n... moreInput might not good, but output is different story in digital world, only Motorola can maximize output better than mi with sd835, that is why people buy intel, asus mainbord with higher price rather than cheap but bad output
Screen seems very plush. Motorola is surprisingly good at gaming, even with old chipsets.
Motorola is lagging from Redmi, as Redmi Note5 Pro is with Snapdragon 636 Chipset.
This was not expected.
I don't care about the specs but what is that GODAWFUL skin i see -_-
Anonymous, 15 Feb 2018Redmi Note 5 Pro: no fast charging, no USB-C and ships with Android Nougat. LOL! Better than ... moreI don't care about these. I only care for that phone being the first to use SD 636.
Mirkran, 14 Feb 2018I have a Galaxy A5 (2017) and I bought a Moto G5S Plus as a backup phone. The Moto is cheaper,... moreI've heard a saying "if you want to buy Samsung phones, buy the S and Note series, it is not recommended to buy anything lower".
Well, although the Redmi Note 5 (Pro) is not all stars & roses. But, compared to the Moto G6 Plus (top model) is definitely better (specs-wise, etc.) SD 630 Vs SD 636, 3,250mAh vs 4000 & much more. Plus it seems that it will cost slightly less than $265/€250 (at least officially, etc.). So it is definitely not a good start for the Moto G6 family. Mostly in India and generally too.
I dont get it. They make the phone taller with the bezels still big.. This is really awkward
The last week when I was at the phone shop the Motorola phones were the most ugly ones in design. Plus looks dated. And it seems it'll continue in that line. Add that their limited specifications-price which in whole make them not a good choice, dismissed.
You know I hate Xiaomi die hard fans cause they just judging phone by SoC only.
ToonToon, 14 Feb 2018Xiaomi providing Snapdragon 636 chipset with 4000 mAh battery. And Lenovo doing just bull shit.Hasn't Xiaomi been doing that just to attract customers? They don't need profit.
Great choice, hopefully service back to old days 2major update, dont like samsung just once for non flagship, infact s3 was so late & 1 update only
Anonymous, 14 Feb 2018I have the G5S with SD 430 and it's definitely not slow and doesn't lag either I have the Moto E4 with a 417 and it's definitely not slow.
Love the Community, 14 Feb 2018The G6 Plus is already destroyed by the superior Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro with its SD 636. That... moreRedmi Note 5 Pro: no fast charging, no USB-C and ships with Android Nougat. LOL! Better than Moto G6? LOLOLOLOLOLOL
AnonD-368020, 14 Feb 2018Now a days, almost like every other smartphone gives better value for money than Moto phones. I have a Galaxy A5 (2017) and I bought a Moto G5S Plus as a backup phone. The Moto is cheaper, but delivers better everyday performance and is more responsive than A5, and can record 4K video and 1080p, 60fps, whereas A5 can't (not even the more expensive A8 can). A5 has better battery life but not by a huge margin. Personally, I prefer Moto midrangers than Samsung midrangers (or premium midrangers for that matter)
Anonymous, 14 Feb 2018It's a Moto, so of course it will have huge bezels! hahaYou said it like bezels were bad. Since bezels are an aesthetic feature, then is a matter of taste. Some will like it, some will tolerate it and others will just hate it.