Normalny it should be promosing but mediatek its not that case.
Let's just wait on the gpu benchmarks :)
Weduz97, 24 Feb 2018LOL, your 1+5T has an SD835 which is a High End SoC. While Helio P is a midrange SoC, you sho... moreSD670 still at the developement stage and not yet officially launch by Qualcomm.
MarcioR, 23 Feb 2018Lol a qualcomm killer? Please my oneplus 5T scored a whole 1k more on geekbench and it totall... moreLOL, your 1+5T has an SD835 which is a High End SoC. While Helio P is a midrange SoC, you should compare with phone with SD652, 660 or 670 SoC
Akorn Farmer, 23 Feb 2018This P60 Geekbench score (single 1524/multi 5871) is direct competitor of Snapdragon 660 (sing... moreThere is an X series that will have high perform, P is focusing on battery and lower price.
Akorn Farmer, 23 Feb 2018This P60 Geekbench score (single 1524/multi 5871) is direct competitor of Snapdragon 660 (sing... moreWhy A72 ?? I see many ignorants here. There is no reason to use that old non-efficient IP.
It's surely A73 clocked lower like 2.0GHz.
Plus, comparing sd821 is totally meaningless. sd821 was a flagship with a very different architecture. It has a very powerful FLOPS which was underrated in GB4 (in GB3 its single score was higher than sd835's). At the same time, sd821's power consumption is much higher. SD821 consumes more than 6W while sd660 and other competitor consumes about 4W
This P60 Geekbench score (single 1524/multi 5871) is direct competitor of Snapdragon 660 (single 1607 multi 5823) or Snapdragon 821 (1604/4162). But little behind the leaked Snapdragon 670 (1863/5256). So it seems some 8 core ARM Cortex A72 *4 + A53 *4 core variant.
But MediaTek AP's are famous for inferior GPU, compared with its CPU. So I won't impressed until I see graphics score and its price.
AnonD-732807, 23 Feb 2018Could be the new A-55 in an 8 core configuration...those will prove very capable also not vuln... moreWell with A55 difference in performance with A75 just got bigger its now 2.2x previously whose smaller; A53 to A72 1.8 8x, to A73 1.9x. So you do need big cores but two is enough. Speculative execution CVE's aren't big concern on Big.little ARM architecture as process priority can be limited...
Not bad score for mediatek, still rubbish considering you will not get any updates or support
Hayaan Mo Sila, 23 Feb 2018NOT ALL MediaTek SoCs are bad. The Helio X and P series are their good ones.and even then they can't reach the levels of Snapdragon 835. (hello? A73 based cores? I am visiting mediatek's site due to work reasons on day to day basis to learn any differences. and tweaking toward. and I have YET to find any new chipset except the X30 to use the A73 core. )
AnonD-732807, 23 Feb 2018Could be the new A-55 in an 8 core configuration...those will prove very capable also not vuln... moreI thought about that, but I think it's more likely that this is a Cortex-A72 at conservative clock speeds, probably around 2.0GHz.
Seems a straight competitor to SD660, virtually no difference, bit Geekbench is just some part of the story. AnTuTu will reveal other parts.
Anonymous, 23 Feb 2018MediaTek is Qualcomm killer.Never. Can't beat snapdragon.
seems like cortex-a72 + cortex-a53
Anonymous, 23 Feb 2018MediaTek is Qualcomm killer. Erm that's a no.
Could be the new A-55 in an 8 core configuration...those will prove very capable also not vulnerable to spectre & meltdown. If these are on a modern finfet process node they could become a sweet spot of price & performance and battery life.
Anonymous, 23 Feb 2018MediaTek is Qualcomm killer.No, it's not.