AnonD-731363, 02 Mar 2018Man then you are blind. When was first time released SD845 snapdragon it was said its cpu is... moreThankfully s9 is worth 720 in US. Pretty good if you have to upgrade from iPhone 7(400 off with that making it worth 320) if you ask me..
That's a minor upgrade for all that hardware hype
someone, 02 Mar 2018DXO scores are never out of 100 .. lmao ... learn the facts before commenting something stupid !!Man it doesnt matter.
You are too clumsy to think what i said.
No matter how much the S9 will score it never will be a phone worth 1000 euros.
Anonymous, 02 Mar 2018It is not a slightly better cpu, the Exynos 9810 is far way better than the Snapdragon 835 and... moreMan then you are blind.
When was first time released SD845 snapdragon it was said its cpu is 10% beter if i remeber exactly from previous model. GPU also a little improvement.
Apart from that camera aperature have a bit better F1.5 from previos F1/7 on S8 othervise the whole phone is same.
Same ram same disk space same 3000 mAh battery same screen same all other everything.
Wake up or learn to read. Phone have nothing worth 1000 eur.
And compared to S8 which you can have for 500 at the present or S7 which you can get for 300 have nothing worth all the extra bucks.
Either you are blind to see your you dont see due to all the nonsense you spreading here.
AnonD-731363, 02 Mar 2018Score 99??? haha, Maybe but out of milion not 100. S8 is same like S9 even S7 is same like... moreDXO scores are never out of 100 .. lmao ... learn the facts before commenting something stupid !!
AnonD-731363, 02 Mar 2018Score 99??? haha, Maybe but out of milion not 100. S8 is same like S9 even S7 is same like... moreIt is not a slightly better cpu, the Exynos 9810 is far way better than the Snapdragon 835 and 845 and in relation to the anterior Exynos cpu. The GPU is what can be a slightly improvement in relation to the anterior GPUs of Galaxy S8/S8+. And the Snapdragon 845 has a Gpu which has a performance that makes difference in relation to anteriors GPUs and even to Mali-G72MP18. Is like this, the new Exynos has a cpu vastly superior to previous cpus and the new Snapdragon has a GPU much better than previous GPUS. But it is not all, the camera with variable aperture, stereo speakers, etc, etc.
Refer the XZ2 vs S9+ camera comparison:
The punchy color not always good when the natural color shows the truth to real life scene/object.
Punchy color just like the MSG in the cooking ingredients, the more MSG doesn't mean come with great taste at the same time.
Score 99??? haha,
Maybe but out of milion not 100.
S8 is same like S9 even S7 is same like S9.
Everything same apart from a slightly better CPU and GPU and much higher price.
People simply jump into total scores given by DxO, without going deeper into it. Just look at the DxO rating charts,for example, in case of Pixel 2 & Galaxy S9 Plus.
Google Pixel 2 DxOmark ratings:
Exposure & Contrust: 95
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus DxOmark ratings:
Exposure & Contrust: 91
So, S9 Plus won just in two categories, Zoom(much higher than the Pixel 2) & Bokeh.Lost in all other categories.So its total score is more than Pixel 2. So I strongly feel Pixel 2 is the winner here, not the Galaxy S9+. People who rely on the DxOmark ratings should go deeper into the results and not just the total score as its misleading.
Pixel 2 unlike fruit & herb seller in 4× has natural colors herb seller is too yellowish..
Anonymous, 02 Mar 2018Of course, the Nokia N86, way back in 2009, had a variable aperature, with three f stops, wher... moreThe aperture selection was automatic in the Nokia but can be manually selected in S9. This is good if you wish for a shallow depth of field in good light, or good depth of field in low light when the phone is mounted on a tripod.
Dx0 Mark "404 page not found". Always like that, few hour after release the test result. It just for sensation... Dont trust it....
Of course, the Nokia N86, way back in 2009, had a variable aperature, with three f stops, whereas the S9 only has two. It also had a much superior mechanical shutter, which the S9 lacks.
As usual, in many ways phone cameras are still playing catch-up to the great Nokia N series phones of a decade ago.
geordie81, 01 Mar 2018No phone has scored 100% fully, although if im not mistaken DxO measure it slightly different ... morehttps://m.gsmarena.com/dxo_iphone_x_top_still_camera-news-28129.php 101 the score was.
AnonD-708613, 02 Mar 2018Dude are u high or something? its the other way round. Everyone established that the Dx0 re... moreMate 10 has 97, iphone x 94 or 96(don't remember properly). Didn't know 96 was greater than 97..
NoMatter, 01 Mar 2018I'm sorry, but looking at the samples comparison provided in the article samsung looks worst o... moreGo to below site and zoom in to see the difference.S9+ kills the competition :)
hajajajaja.. again.. again.. dxo mark spread a lie! hahaaha.. dzo mark? fu*k you all!!
Anonymous, 01 Mar 2018Now that the Samsung Galaxy S9+ camera had a excellent test and score, the results are fake an... moreDude are u high or something? its the other way round.
Everyone established that the Dx0 review is paid review when iphone scores higher that mate 10. now when samsung scores high its all legit again?
pot calling the kettle black