Anonymous, 01 Mar 2018Some company can not do that. It's about ethic. Just look Samsung bribery scandal to the Sou... moreEvery country in the world has more or less of bribery including Japan and US.
DxO turned to be fully mobile benchmark...
Still waiting their score on some Sony FE Lens that out for a few months.
lewein, 01 Mar 2018never trust DxO! they are paid.Now that the Samsung Galaxy S9+ camera had a excellent test and score, the results are fake and the site is paid, but if was a camera of an iPhone or of a Sony phone with these results it was worthy and true and it was a good testing site. Fanatic, depreciative and fool people who don't stand with Samsung and their technology of smartphones, discriminatory and racist, don't like the Koreans and their technology and have envy of their success as the biggest conglomerate and company of the world who those people don't like and don't respect.
I'm sorry, but looking at the samples comparison provided in the article samsung looks worst of them all. No contrast at all (looks like HDR is always on), colours is completely off.
[deleted post]Some company can not do that. It's about ethic.
Just look Samsung bribery scandal to the South Korean Government. It might caused former president Park Geun-hey 20-30 years in prison.
Now South Korean's prosecutors have decided to investigate a direct bribery link between ex-President Lee Myung-bak and Samsung officials. It's another scandal.
[deleted post]Everyone knows that it is a fraud to throw away money?
There are 9 itens for photo.
7 of them S9+ has lower score than Pixel 2. S9+ only wins for noise and zoom. And still higher score of photos.
New protocol sucks. Quality matters more than hardware.
Samsung just made DxO Mark filthy rich sending them big fat check!!
Zenodroid, 01 Mar 201899? Didn't some phones score over 100, a few months ago. Looking at the page, two DSLRs scored 100, and two scored above. Nothing about phones (99, 98, 97, 97...). I remember reading something like that too, but I guess it was about DSLRs.
Good scores by Galaxy S9+.. I wish HTC U12 will bettered S9+ and performed well in real world too..
[deleted post]They also test Apple. Others don't send phones in for testing. Well. Then wait until GSMArena tests the display and tells you the same. Sony users... Yawn.
I hope the S9's camera is really worth the hype, that being said "do not believe in DxOMark".
I don't have anything against DisplayMate, their testing results are usually true.
Cirov12, 01 Mar 2018Fakedxomark Only publish what you send samaung lol does not analyze anything, They only sell u... moreAre you talking about DxO or DisplayMate now? Plenty of phones tested on DxO. As for displays, GSMArena tests displays as well. And they agreed, for example, about the S8. What now?
MdN8, 01 Mar 2018OK, this totally makes sense. Thank you for proving me wrong with facts and research and elabo... more There is no website that analyzes mobile screens, fakedxomark only publishes Advertorials
MdN8, 01 Mar 2018OK, this totally makes sense. Thank you for proving me wrong with facts and research and elabo... moreFakedxomark Only publish what you send samaung lol does not analyze anything, They only sell usbs to calibrate screens that nobody buys