r33fd, 23 Mar 2018The Adreno GPU is amazing . Congrats to Qualcomm for making it so small yet so powerful.
GPU ... moreI think you're wrong ...
When a GPU can no longer run a game, and another GPU a little faster will also be inefficient to play ...
Exynos: 12 FPS
Adreno: 15.5 FPS (+ 30%)
There will be little difference, you can not play well in any ...
Anonymous, 23 Mar 2018So many Apple haters in denial even though A11 chip clearly the winner. Honestly Android fanbo... moreI don't hate them for the preformance (Although personally I want that power in my hand.) I hate them for the general usage, it's like golden cuffs.
And I am talking about myself. Others have their own reasons.
So many Apple haters in denial even though A11 chip clearly the winner. Honestly Android fanboys are like flat earthers.
kingOfsling, 23 Mar 2018they have already lost to adreno in benchmarks. so there is that too.True that.
r33fd, 23 Mar 2018The Adreno GPU is amazing . Congrats to Qualcomm for making it so small yet so powerful. GPU ... moreThe adreno not only wins by being smaller and faster, but in power comsumption (so heat production and battery drain) also is well ahead of the competition.
r33fd, 23 Mar 2018The Adreno GPU is amazing . Congrats to Qualcomm for making it so small yet so powerful. GPU ... morenot to mention the thermal efficiency of a Snapdragon (excluding 810), which beats exynos SOCs by quite a margin on Anandtech.
Just an innocent question... where's Mediatek with its deca-core chipset or something? :P
Btw, editors... there's some mistake in the title. Try looking at it again.
The Adreno GPU is amazing . Congrats to Qualcomm for making it so small yet so powerful.
GPU performance also ages faster than CPU due to games becoming more and more demanding so I think snapdragon 845 is slightly more feature proof than Exynos .
If you have to choose, buy a snapdragon variant. You'll thank me later.
Fulljack, 23 Mar 2018Apple only won in peak performance, a step in which Samsung also follows. In sustained perform... moreBut the underwhelming part of what Apple have done is, not giving sufficient or extra RAM, and also, the type of optimization they are doing to their software
hansip87, 23 Mar 2018Apple chip doesn't include the modem, so it's apple vs orange comparison. The only wow part he... moreSo you were able to deny facts by twisting them around to your taste. Impressive what fanboys can do. You also probably still argue that climate change is not fastened by humans and smoking is not harming your lungs
Apple only won in peak performance, a step in which Samsung also follows. In sustained performance (which you should consider if you play games in your phone), the SD 845 won hard. the Kirin 970 are somewhat in-between
Apple's scores are better on benchmarks and less impressive in actual daily use.
Samsung should beat or tie with apple next year. Qualcomm has best gpu.
The most eye opening thing about this is the size of those M3 cores. Holy moly! they are HUGE!
Shows the cost of increasing single-thread performance. One of those M3 cores takes the space of an entire octo-core A53 design.
Apple chip doesn't include the modem, so it's apple vs orange comparison. The only wow part here is how that Adreno GPU is so small yet faster than anything else. CPU side, i don't think faster CPU matters that much in Smartphone world if it eats battery power and requiring higher voltage, which, causes iPhone to throttle when the battery ages. so SD845 is still the better of them all.