Meh, my ZenFone 3 Zoom easily lasts longer
Also, "at sony's request" means sony paid Strategy Analytics to make their 'latest' flagships win obviously...
Engineer, 30 Mar 2018Japanese only can easily beat korean and especially just chineseT o o m u c h u n d e r e s t i m a t i n g.
Biased test. Sony paid for it. Mate 10 pro, lg v30 and s9 plus n one plus 5t were not invited 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Not new News to me,,, just another indication of high end SONY tech.
[deleted post]Replikas alrite... P20 starts triple camera, when samsung and sony put triple camera in future, care to call them replika as well? Such an ignorant yet st00pid thinking. Its called technology mate, and u cant stop them, because they make improvement, so that we had a choice. Huawei users know how good the phone is. I'm an ex Xperia flagship user as well, switching to huawei flagship, happier ever after. Both sony and huawei got it pros and cons, and i experience the pros more huawei rather than sony (camera, features, ui). Dont make a joke of yourself please.
AnonD-370043, 30 Mar 2018Lg V30 and mate 10 are super flagship they are in different League. XZ2 Is Sony flagship, and ... moreLol fail logic. If by your means mate 10 super flagship, then what the h3ll mate 10 pro then? Mega flagship? Its around the same price, that matters.
Anonymous, 30 Mar 2018It is not fair to compare a 4000mAh against 3120. Phones chosen have similar battery sizes. ... moreIt is fair because all of them around the same flagship price! All users wants to make their money worth it. Why compare for battery capacity. If for the same price they give u bigger battery, then u know the other smaller capacity battery branded phone makes more profit and drip your money.
Sony Flagship: Xperia XZ2 ~ 5.7" ~ 3180mAh
LG Flagship: V30 ~ 6.0" ~ 3300mAh
Apple Flagship: X ~ 5.8" ~ 2716mAh
Huawei Flagship: Mate 10 Pro ~ 6.0" ~ 4000mAh
Samsung Flagship: Galaxy S9+ ~ 6.2" ~ 3500mAh
Oppo Flagship: R11s Plus ~ 6.43" ~ 4000mAh
These are the phones that should've been used, end of discussion.
How are people trying to justify this atrocity of a test by saying that choosing the phones from the test "makes it fair"?? How does choosing ancient phones (one even over a year old) make it fair? The only way to be fair is by choosing the latest/best from each company. Sony wanted it to be a level playing field; well they should've made a better flagship then.
They have to be best to claim that. Just being good compared to some others doesn't conclude that.
Why is everyone so bias?
Next year for sure, Samsung Oneplus Huawei etc. will pay this Strategy Analytics just to crown them, like what happen to DxO.
It's interesting to see 'kids' classifying phones... Now even have super flagship category...
The fact is a phone is a phone, but people will go to their deaths to debate on specs... Reality is, specs matters if you're a developer, a consumer shouldn't really meddle around these info as though they're expert...
AnonD-370043, 30 Mar 2018Lg V30 and mate 10 are super flagship they are in different League. XZ2 Is Sony flagship, and ... moreThat makes absolutely no sense. Stop making up terms. The article says simply flagships.
Anonymous, 30 Mar 2018It is not fair to compare a 4000mAh against 3120. Phones chosen have similar battery sizes. ... moreif they would have exactly the same software, then it was unfair. But they haven't, so that shows how efficient (or not) software is. Also there are other variables, like resulution, etc..
Judging by the picture on top of the article the testing method looks highly scientific and easily repeatable.