Anonymous, 02 Apr 2018If phones like oppo f7 and vivo v9 can sell. This will definitely sell too.People who buy them are fools but at least they have bigger battery than this 6X.
6X's battery is a joke and an insult to the fans.
I wanted to go for Mi A1 but then I stopped and waited for Mi A2. Thought it would be a better choice but what a lol.
I will buy Nokia 7 Plus which is far better than this shit.
Battery should be atleast 3500mah coz the Redmi series had 4000mah.
If Fast charging is supported than 3000mah battery will also be good.
Looks to be a nice package overall even with SD626 (as they do not want to compete with their own Redmi Pro inn same price range).
Anonymous, 02 Apr 2018welp, putting zero big cores in 2018 for a mid ranger is simply..Yeah, from today on I will never ever buy a phone without big cores
sinata, 02 Apr 2018a sausage screen with just 3000Mah battery not a BIG FAIL A VERY BIG FAILIf phones like oppo f7 and vivo v9 can sell. This will definitely sell too.
a sausage screen with just 3000Mah battery
not a BIG FAIL
A VERY BIG FAIL
Anonymous, 02 Apr 2018SD 626 is a disappointment. We need SD 630, 640 or even higher class 660SD 630 is also marginally better than 626. SD 636 would be better as it should be in the same range as redmi note 5 pro.
OMG This is such a disappointment. I was waiting for it but Snapdragon 626 and such a small battery is not my cuppa tea.
I am going for Nokia 7 Plus.
Really?. Then there is no point in buying it. Basically the redmi 5 plus.
Truly disappointing. They should have put a snapdragon 636 or surge s2 chipset and a bigger battery in the most anticipated phone of 2018. The MI fans shall be totally let down if these rumours come true. Let us just hope Xiaomi lets these rumours remain (false) rumours and releases a much better product with a good pricing, or else it will be digging its own grave (no offence here).
Persevere to keep up your awsomeness Xiaomi!!!!!!!!!!!!
Anonymous, 02 Apr 2018SD 626 is a disappointment. We need SD 630, 640 or even higher class 660SD627 could have been better :D LOL