This Mobile is very cheep and outstanding looks so very good mobile
nice i like it :-) . not all people can buy high end device >> a lot of people love to buy low end :-) not all people is rich :( . well done nokia keep it up . nokia you should focus more on space :-) if the device is high end mid range low end >> focus more on space
I think nokia did a good job they make phones for all type of people, expensive once for the rich and affordable once for the less riches, unlike apple!!!!but then again people in south africa nowadays only use blackberry curve 8520 R1700.
really cool phone, i pre order this iphone4s suxxx!! jijijiji
nice look and comfortable
nokia is really super duper i have no words to share my comments on nokia it is ossam god bless to nokia
it is good but nokiac5-03 is betterrrrrrrrrrr
Do you guys know what Nokia C5-08 is? Check the PDF I saw on their site: http://nds1.nokia.com/declaration_of_confirmity/files/declaration_of_conformity/Nokia_C5-08_-__RM-814_R&TTE_DoC.pdf
5233 replacement indeed. A 600mhz processor is a huge jump at that price point, this phone will be much faster than the one its replacing. For many this will be their first brush with Kinetic scrolling as 5233 didn't have that in the original firmware.
go nokia go,
You are the best..........
nokia is the number one brand in asia,nokia phone is very friendly can use,,,,,,,,,but nokia smart phone is not good,,,,,,,why? i dont know?
Please Nokia, ditch all your old designs.
Better yest, design a phone with no design at all, like most phones out there.
GG, 08 Oct 2011cmon la....apple are better than nokia...........Oh really then apple should launch phones which should be affordable to everyone. Can apple launch a phone for atleast 200 euros huh.:-). No its only for rich ppl and not everyone in the world is rich
This can be a good replacement for nokia 5233 and 5230:-). If the price is same.. Good low end smartphones
fercareta, 07 Oct 2011wow nokia, this is really a crap, cmon u can do better...cmon la....apple are better than nokia...........
Resistive touch. duh!
Resistive touch screen of NOKIA is just horrible.
[deleted post]I agree totally, that Nokia can and should try to service all niches in the market. However S60 is a smartphone OS that simply doesn't satisfy those who are in the market for a smartphone. These handsets could almost certainly run Sym^3 (600MHz vs 680MHz in N8) and nobody who's not a fellow nerd likes resistive touchscreens. Such poor decision making...
*shakes head* Nokia what the hell are you doing?? S60 isn't the worst OS of all time, but it's FAR, FAR from good enough for a modern smartphone. Use S40 for feature phones, Sym^3 for smartphones and WP7 for flagships. I'm a fan and I want you to do well, but how can you expect to manage four separate ecosystems!?
GET YOUR ACT TOGETHER. PLEASE!!
I still prefer the design of Nokia 5233 over c5-03. C5-03 is thin and feels much lighter but I like the thickness and weight of my phone(brick). Even though it is 2 years old and s60v5 much older, I can write blogspot blogs on my phone on the go and I don't miss my computer(except for gaming). I wish it had a faster processor and bigger RAM as it is now getting old some websites that used to work before aren't working anymore. I can still play you tube videos at 360p but for that I have to embed it in a html document through Quickoffice, as the Youtube site won't let me play in on my phone.
But still, it is a lot better than more costly dumbphones as I have HTML 5 support, Swype keyboard, all necessary apps.