Just a disgusting gimmick from Huawei.... Lame
mısa, 09 Aug 2018bluetooth 5 ? 5g ?Don't need those.
Nope. The graph on the right is the battery life. On the left are battery size in mAh and on the right is how long it last on the phone. That's why we have bottom line connecting all together. And the picture of the graph is on the battery, not on phone's screen...
I think the graph indicates display size, not battery size
p10 plus 5.5, mate 10 pro 6.0, p20 pro 6.1
walauweh, 09 Aug 2018i dont think its wrong using labs control benchmarking. u r rite about lte drains more than wi... moreI agree with the difficulty of standardizing tests based on mobile LTE data use. However, the fact is, people rarely use wifi on their Gigabit LTE equipped phones. Majority are on Facebook and watch Youtube and are browsing news and other websites mostly, if not exclusively, on mobile LTE data alone. There's a huge difference in actual battery endurance when you are using mostly wifi only (rare) as opposed to using mostly or exclusively mobile data only (a lot more common). To claim that phone A will last longer than phone B because of higher endurance rating from gsmarena's WIFI based testing is at best, misleading. People truly concerned about battery life need only to look at the battery capacity and should definitely ignore gsmarena's battery endurance ratings especially if they are heavy mobile LTE data users. Wifi only users may still use those endurance ratings as reference for buying phones with long lasting batteries but, really, how many are they? Gsmarena should revise their test protocol to include mobile LTE data and it doesn't have to be a perfectly controlled. By rmaking several mobile data trials and taking the average of several trials as the rating, you are closer to providing real world battery performance, however imperfect the testing might be than having a perfectly repeatable wifi only testing with zero correlation to real world performance.
Gsmarena doesn't need to redo all the battery endurance tests for all phones either. Only newly released phones may be included in the new database. It's pointless providing a database of obsolete, no longer produced smartphones anyway. Gsmarena can call it 'Battery Endurance Test II'.
Note 9 is gonna be destroyed by this Bad Boy. 7000mAh is my guess.
dvdivx, 09 Aug 2018Huawei needs far better LTE support to move this worldwide. Also the fact that their phones ar... moreare you kidding me? Huawei has the best phone call signals. They build 1/3 of the world LTE networks.
I love the bateery from Huawei Mate
Anonymous, 09 Aug 2018Samsung galaxy note 8. 3300mAH battery 89hrs battery endurance. Huawei P20 Pro. 4000mAH bat... moreThe situation here is a bit different compared to last year... Kirin 970 wasn't any more efficient than Exynos 8895 because they were both based on 10nm process node and using CPU/GPU cores in the same generation. Kirin 980 on the other hand will use newer cores than those on current Exynos 9810 and is going to be built on 7nm node which can make a huge difference in power consumption.
panel on the right could mean endurance or whatever, no way its mistake, its marketing...
That red bar chart on the right could even have a double-meaning. Battery life may have been steadily increasing across the phones shown(if not mAh), but screen size has also being going up which I think is something we all expect to be the case with the Mate 20.
I'm the only one from my friends with a Huawei flag ship (mate10pro) and from what I have hear/seen from my friends with Samsung flagships. My phone lasts longer, way longer, them theirs. This includes the S9, 9+, Note 8 etc...
Sometimes we sent eachother screenshots about how our phones perform and my friends are always shocked how my phone lasts this long...
But ofcourse it all depends how you use your phone and how your settings are.
For me, I'm a heavy user which get 1.5days out of my phone and I get 2+ days when I'm not using it much.
Josh, 09 Aug 2018True dude you just read my thoughts! I think people who don't understand how battery drainage ... moreIf someone didn't bother reading the test parameters it's their fault.
As for the endurance rating, it's to make a reference point where you can test all phones as objective as possible. As far as I know, it started before Lte was mainstream and adding it to the test now means you'll have great phones with lower battery rating than older bad phones.
Also, not all people use mobile data for long, and battery capacity may play a role, but also phone's internals and distance from the cell tower if my info is correct.
dvdivx, 09 Aug 2018Huawei needs far better LTE support to move this worldwide. Also the fact that their phones ar... moreafaik cuz i use 1, international version covers 21 bands lte, which i think quite ok at the moment.
Anonymous, 09 Aug 2018Endurance rating is actually meaningless for most users. None of Gsmarena's endurance tests EV... morei dont think its wrong using labs control benchmarking. u r rite about lte drains more than wifi, but lte drains depend on how strong is the signal, and it varies from telco to telco depend on tech that the telco deployed, u can read any white paper on lte on how telco try to work on their sides to ease the battery drains.
meanwhile,wifi power is more stable, so its fair, cuz the use same wifi n same wifi protocol.
on gaming, it will be varied unless its controlled gaming using robotics, cuz u shud know when project butter was introduce, cpu will ramp up when it sense a touch, how to control that without control environment? thats why lab testing is important, to reduce any variable, to make it fair like nits control n etc.
unlike some youtube reviewer, using 50% brightness as protocol, when 50% brightness is diff interm of nits from one device to another.
im not saying gsm arena testing is perfect, but its not as bad as u said.
ps: its hard to control tower switching or signal strength of lte( even from same telco) to be the same unless u put the device at the same exact place n let it idle.
Just reading the comments section so far we have guesses of:
...so I'll throw my hat into the ring:
4,001mAh battery, to correspond with that distorted graph ; )
Anonymous, 09 Aug 2018Endurance rating is actually meaningless for most users. None of Gsmarena's endurance tests EV... moreTrue dude you just read my thoughts! I think people who don't understand how battery drainage and endurance works, at east now they have a chance to learn something.
jefire411, 09 Aug 2018Graphite battery!Probably not. That tech is not stable nor cheap enough yet. Perhaps with the release of foldable phones it becomes more mainstream