Moj, 20 Oct 2018And tring to be smart ass is the worst of all!making your own decisions doesn't make you smart, But repeating others point of view without thinking for yourself does make you a sheep.
Where is $1000+ Apple mobile in the list?
Probably you need to spend another $1000 for that.... Hahaha Poor Apple.
Fayth, 22 Oct 2018SnapDragon is better than Exynos?
well I should avoid exynos next timeActually it's not that straight forward & this is only 1 benchmark, and it doesn't show the full picture.
You would have a bigger picture if you saw all of the benchmarks & compared, but the most important is real life performance.
I know that the S9's have improved in performance & efficiency over time with OverTheAir's updates.
In short, I understand the SD845's Adreno 630 GPU to be more powerful, but the Exynos 9810 CPU is faster.
In real life it would be difficult to tell any difference.
Snapdragon is in America & China, whereas Exynos is used in the rest of the World.
It's usually best to buy the handset in your region for warranty, repairs & OTA updates.
I was hoping to show you S9 benchmarks for both Exynos & Snapdragon, or a long-term review, but I couldn't find.
These performance benchmark pages might help, but be sure to just enjoy in real life:
I nearly bought the S9, but it was bit too small for me, I actually got the S9+ from my carrier but I cancelled because I didn't like their Terms & Conditions, I'm now looking @ Note 9 (Black Friday), or wait for the S10+/ Note 10.
So I'm not an S9 owner, but head over to the S9 community fo any user tips:
Fayth, 19 Oct 2018where's Galaxy S9?S9 is @ 11 for SD & 18 for Exynos:
#11 SAMSUNG S9+ (SDM845) 6GB+64GB
89530 58499 107052 263503
#12 SAMSUNG S9 (SDM845) 4GB+64GB
89270 58503 106356 262395
#17 SAMSUNG S9+ (9810) 6GB+256GB
89460 55325 94100 247731
#18 SAMSUNG S9 (9810) 4GB+64GB
89007 55319 92409 245262
#19 SAMSUNG Note 9 (9810) 8GB+512GB
84400 53259 96366 242374
Kiyasuriin, 18 Oct 2018Heh, you're surprised? ;PNo i am not.
But i am glad that chinese phones such as xiaomi improved a lot in quality and other possitive aspects a lot since last few years.
Now they are almost equal to Huawei and Samsung and equal to apple Apple.
Linux android, 19 Oct 2018Haha who buys a Chinese gaming phone? Razer phone is better. Black shark is not faster then ... moreRazer is best gaming phone money can buy.
Maybe ROG is a bit better but a lot costlier.
So in this case Razer is winner. My opinion.
But we cant compare blackshark and note.
Blackshark is faster with faster charging and a lot of simple things for a simple price.
S Pen and IP68 arent worth the difference between blackshark and Note 9.
Linux android, 19 Oct 2018Haha who buys a Chinese gaming phone? Razer phone is better. Black shark is not faster then ... moreBut blackshark is faster than note.
And note is crao.
Rather buy huawei mate 20 pro. Same price a lot better features.
Scamsung and its S line or N line are laughable.
Big company huge profit but only crumbles for its customers.
alphavirus, 19 Oct 2018Your argument to compare the ASUS ROG Phone versus the Xiaomi Black Shark doesn't consider pri... moreYou can only argue with false price. lol
ROG Phone started with $900 incl. worthy freebies in most markets.
and that's a version with 8GB of RAM and 128GB of storage.
. . . and 3x USB Type-C 3.1! (one single
and one very special double on the side, that also offer 3,5mm jack trough the cooler acc)
and incl. that unic AeroActive cooler Acc.
that's also with Aura RGB,
programable for notifications as well.
Just some of the unic features for you, thoose no elsewhere available this time.
Gary, 20 Oct 2018No phones from LG, Sony and HTC, so premium means slow now? Or maybe they know that benchmarks race is pointless and doesn't prove anything so they don't even try? Plus 99% of the market doesn't care.
Today i tested Sony Xperia XZ3, and result was amazing, on that list would be on 3rd place (290315).
Antutu benchmark v7.1.0
WhatÂ’s the hype about those benchmarks if itÂ’s been proven on numerous ocassions that ohone manufacturers temper with software to achieve the best result during tests and the real life oerformance has got nothing to do with the actual result.