leledumbo, 07 Nov 2018710 actually already smashes 820 off (albeit not much, only 5000-10000 difference), according ... moreI guess without looking at the benchmarks, these mid-end chipsets have in fact surpassed older high-end chipsets in terms of performance overall
leledumbo, 07 Nov 2018710 actually already smashes 820 off (albeit not much, only 5000-10000 difference), according ... moresd 710 is fine but still sd820 is better chipset overall due to most powerful adreno 530 card besides the original kryo are more powerful remember we can achieve 5000-10000 less with 4 lesser cores -2 high performance -2 low energy despite using 10nm
xXENDER FREAKXx, 07 Nov 2018Again, the weak GPU gets compensated by the CPU's power, overall allowing it to score more tha... more710 actually already smashes 820 off (albeit not much, only 5000-10000 difference), according to this result 675 beats 710, so it's logical that 675 will beat 820 by some more margin.
sm4rt4ss, 06 Nov 2018@The Voice of Reason what's not to understand?
2xx entry level
4xx lower midrange
6xx midr... moreThere.. I've made the corrections for you :p
2xx bargain barrel bottom level
40x - 43x entry level (quad core)
43x - 49x lower midrange (octo core)
6xx midrange
7xx upper mid range
8xx flagships
Again, the weak GPU gets compensated by the CPU's power, overall allowing it to score more than SNAPDRAGON 820 smartphones in AnTuTu (most probably)
Oppo n vivo will use new SOC first,this year end will see the phone.
Warning....everyone take this as a grain of salt, because these "leaks" are fairly simple to fake/produce.
The real benchmark of smartphone performance is the user's experience.
Nicknam, 06 Nov 2018I though the same. They should rename : - SD 43* to SD 3** - SD 63* to SD 5** I will... moreSo SD 2xx will be no range? :)
The Voice of Reason, 06 Nov 2018Qualcomm must fire their marketing department.
Their SoCs' numbers make no sense whatsoever... moreI though the same.
They should rename :
- SD 43* to SD 3**
- SD 63* to SD 5**
I will be better to have:
- entry level SD3**
- low range SD4**
- low midrange SD5**
- high midrange SD6**
- high range SD7**
- flagship SD8**
- tablet/laptop SD9** (more cores)
My naming scheme is simple and easy to understand.
ZolaIII, 06 Nov 2018I just did the math. It seems that A76 (at least in this QC form) is only 50% faster clock per... moreIt could also be that these Cortex A76 cores are underclocked to somehow lessen the power consumption and achieve lower thermal throttling.
Nonetheless, it's incredible that such level of performance is coming to the mid range category, which indicates that Qualcomm might be up with something even better than Cortex A76 cores for their flagship SD8150.
Anonymous, 06 Nov 2018More like
6 5 x Upper mid range
7xx upper mid range with AI stuffMore like
6 5 x Upper mid range
7xx upper mid range with extra gimmicks
well im still with my 14nm sd 820 and I don't feel the need of a change not even sd 845 makes me think different I need a real game changer as for now everything is smooth and fast and besides we are still using 2k screen ... I thibk that a good time to upgrade is when devices are 4k ready ... not that im waiting for a 4k screen but enough muscle to push pixels in fact
Meanwhile some major phone still lauch with a 18 mounth old SOC and some OEM achieve to make phone at the same price with the "flagship" soc.
Qualcomm have no control of their market and I think could make something way more powerful if they don't aim for a mass high end market.
I just did the math. It seems that A76 (at least in this QC form) is only 50% faster clock per clock when compared to A73/A72. Which is lot slower than initial projections siting at around 66%.
Andy, 06 Nov 2018So where exactly does this chip place in Qualcomm's lineup?It places as the real spiritual successor of S650 & a worthy one. It's intended to become the successor of S636 by adoption and marke position but we will have to wait & see about that. Finally one sole reason QC rushed it is because they want to retake buck some midrange space lost by MTK Helio series (P60 and it's successors).
Anonymous, 06 Nov 201811nm is same as 14nm++ so just a marketing term... though so is the 10nm Also just a marketing... moreAccording to Samsung this 11nm (third gen 14 nm with UHD rooting lib) is actually little higher density than first gen 10 nm LPE meanwhile its also cheaper.
Hopefully on motorola G7
Relevant reading
https://semiengineering.com/how-many-nanometers/
https://www.engadget.com/2012/06/15/engadget-primed-nanometers/
we need more of these mid-upper-low-left-down-high-last-but-not-least QC mid range SoCs.
Tip us
1.7m 126k
RSS
EV
Merch
Log in I forgot my password Sign up