Anonymous, 13 Dec 2018Well the note 5 but basically same thing.
And that's probably the 2.5d glass thing. And some ... moreSoon everything will be curved after the stealing technology at Samsung as we read klast week on GSM Arena.
But i dont care.
I always try to buy flat phones.
Curved screens are too fragile and too resistant to proper screen protector.
CptPower, 12 Dec 2018S6 was last of the line without a curved screen.
Now even a basic J series have minimal but ... moreWell the note 5 but basically same thing.
And that's probably the 2.5d glass thing. And some of those cheaper ones they do give curves to now
Anonymous, 09 Dec 2018The note 4 came before that and was definitely better in many ways. And the s6 and note 5 asid... moreS6 was last of the line without a curved screen.
Now even a basic J series have minimal but does they have curves on edges of a screen.
I really dont like that.
Anonymous, 10 Dec 2018Translation... I write a lot of non sense in large amounts so therefore I'm smarter and better. Translation: I'm d1 so upset I must keep on whining coze Im like 12yrs old
Lmao d dude owned u bruv.
U just make a fool of urself, u write nonsense reinforcing his point.u've been served!Drop it, move on stop clogging d thread.
Respect to annon dude 1,great comms!
I think it looks awesome, this is technology, its good for some change, great work samsung
Anonymous, 09 Dec 2018Denial of what? Do you even know what you are writing about? "Look at you writing an overly... moreTranslation... I write a lot of non sense in large amounts so therefore I'm smarter and better.
Anonymous, 09 Dec 2018And you continue in denial.
"Stick to the point." I was direct to the point. You're the one ... moreDenial of what? Do you even know what you are writing about?
"Look at you writing an overly exhaustive novel to try and show how superior you think you are. " -> subjective assumption based on what? where in the text implies superiority? The text analyses point by point what was said precisely not create assumptions. You cannot make claims without providing evidence. That's why the response was long cause it addressed point by point what had been said.
"Getting so upset over a simple statement" -> subjective assumption; where in the text is said that?
"You're the one who is all over the place." -> where exactly?
"Those are direct observations based on the words you chose and your actions. If that's not the case... Which it is... Then it's your fault for presenting then that way." -> what are you on about man?
"Claiming in hypocrisy how they were trying to seem so smart." -> subjective assumption again, in which you do not refer to the text to show how you mean it is hypocritical. Do you even know what hypocrisy means, and how to apply it? Cause it makes no sense what you write.
Hypocrisy is the practice of claiming to have higher standards or more noble beliefs than is the case. Where was that claimed in the response?
In the response was claimed that observation, analysis to reach logical conclusions should be used. Is that pretending to claim have higher standards or more noble beliefs than the case? No it is logic!
And who the response was addressed to was the one who pretended to have higher standards, by paraphrasing some sentence that was supposed to be interpreted as gospel of truth, and claimed all the rest were stupid, which in here it is hypocrisy, without ever addressing the point of being discussed.
And you again go on and on trying to beat around the bush without ever sticking to the point which was the relevance of having 3 cameras on the back to those who want a smaller screen phone with the best camera array.
And then you again go on and on trying to subtly devalue my points not by using logic nor by pointing exactly in the text, but by trying to undermine what I say by making personal attacks, which once again, is an ad hominem attack: "Thought you were so smart " "Congratulations on your victory with some random comment on a phone site.""You must be so proud."Congration you done it."
If you were trying to trigger me, or upset me, with those ironic attacks, I told you already, even though I recognise that you are intentionally trying to wind me up, what you say is meaningless until I give it meaning... and the meaning I give to your words is... well I keep it to myself ;)
You just assumed because the response was long, that the person must have been upset? Why? And because the person invested time and logic in writing something that it had to be to show it was superior? Why? Then you refer things that I've no idea what you are referring to, then you continuously try to devalue the arguments made not with rational logic, but with personal attacks. Feel free to disagree with all, but at least provide logical arguments so that the conversation expands and something beneficial can be taken how of it.
Observing your responses, and by dissecting them through analysis, it is logical to conclude, since you provided no clarity to anything, didn't bring any logical arguments, and just do subtle devaluing insults attacking the person and not what was written, that this, to you, is about ego. the ego, which is a primitive tool, only understands winning or loosing. "(an ability that fan boys don't have, as if they win something, money, pride, from senselessly defending brands, football clubs, races, sexualities, countries, religions... enslaved beings stuck in fighting)". So apparently you need to win -> so there you go man, take the trophy, You won.
Things were explained thoroughly, there is nothing else to add, and nothing else to explain; I tried my best with logic. Therefore, continuing any interaction with you would be an ego trip... and it is not happening, and I am not putting any more energy into this, nor even checking further replies.
So whatever you write, take the trophy!
Anonymous, 09 Dec 2018... again another one trying to be clever and still making ad hominem attacks. Stick to the po... moreAnd you continue in denial.
"Stick to the point." I was direct to the point. You're the one who is all over the place. And no. Those are direct observations based on the words you chose and your actions. If that's not the case... Which it is... Then it's your fault for presenting then that way. Gee... Thought you were so smart and to the point..
Congratulations on your victory with some random comment on a phone site.
You must be so proud.
CptPower, 09 Dec 2018S5 was last perfect Samsung phone since then ugly fragile curved screens dominate samsung phon... moreThe note 4 came before that and was definitely better in many ways. And the s6 and note 5 aside from the s6 edge and plus were not the yet
Anonymous, 09 Dec 2018Oh wow.... Look at you writing an overly exhaustive novel to try and show how superior you thi... more... again another one trying to be clever and still making ad hominem attacks. Stick to the point!
"show how superior you think you are. Getting so upset over a simple statement" -> those are your subjective and conditional interpretations; erroneous btw.
It was extensive in order to be clear, in order to convey a precise message, precisely for not giving rise to dubious interpretations (and still you managed to do it), and was kept to what have been said and not subjective interpretations....
And I am not upset for I am responsible for what I feel and am emotionally mature, and let me define my subjective interpretation of emotionally mature for you so you understand the meaning I put in subjective words: in the sense that if I get upset it is by my own thoughts and beliefs about what I observe, I don't hold myself victim of what others say and "get upset" because of they "said"... for things only have the meaning I give them. Capice?
Neither my words had the intention of acting without lack of integrity nor to inflict pain; and again was extensive because it was an observation, analysis and logical interpretation of what had been said. And the world needs observation, analysis and logical thoughts.
Anonymous, 08 Dec 2018S5 was hideous what are you on about. S6 edge and S7 edge were beautiful. S8/S9 is nice too.S5 was last perfect Samsung phone since then ugly fragile curved screens dominate samsung phones.
I hate curved screens they are resistant even to a screen protector.
Not many cases fit and even less which are compatible with a screen protector.
Curved screens are disgusting. Rather notch than a curved screen.
Anonymous, 09 Dec 2018Yeah and here it comes the pseudo- intelectual, pseudo- superior person, that supposedly makes... moreOh wow.... Look at you writing an overly exhaustive novel to try and show how superior you think you are. Getting so upset over a simple statement that was at least mostly valid. Claiming in hypocrisy how they were trying to seem so smart.
Congration you done it.
Lyndino, 07 Dec 2018Sometimes you just can't win Wally.
As my man Mark Twain once said "never argue with stupid p... moreYeah and here it comes the pseudo- intelectual, pseudo- superior person, that supposedly makes an "intelligent" comment by paraphrasing what someone supposedly did say.
That is still is nothing more that an Ad-hominem attack, which is in itself a fallacious argumentative strategy whereby genuine discussion of the topic at hand is avoided by instead attacking the character, motive, or other attribute of the person making the argument, or persons associated with the argument, rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself. (subtly in this case, calling him stupid, using a supposedly big enlightening statement), in order to devalue the person, so to devalue the argument at hand.
Stick to the point which was that Samsung was imitating apple, not in increasing screen sizes ( kakouille you are the one confused, you should work on your interpretation), but in only providing the better array of cameras on the phone with larger screen.
And Walter C. Dornez et all, the logic that more cameras wouldn't fit in the midsized S10 is not logical. For that was provided the example of P20 and the upcoming P30. Also, the midsized S10 is expected to have 2 cameras. The small S9 only has 1, why is that? Suddenly they managed to get more space? No, it's marketing strategy, imitating what apple did, to try to sell more of the larger and most expensive phone - S9+/S10+.
The point therefore is valid, many people don't want the phone with the larger screen but still want the opportunity to have all the best cameras.
Walter C. Dornez for your sarcastic comment that then people would complain about the battery being small, then again, open your eyes and look at the P20 with its 4000 mAh battery. The P30 with it's 3 cameras most likely have the same amount or more.
So Lyndino stick to the point instead of trying to be clever, cause only the real ignorants will perceive you as such; the ones with ability to add 2+2 see it for what it is, an ad hominem attack.
And above is how you expose things with logic, without going around doing ad hominem attacks, by sticking to what was said.
And even though I appreciate Samsung and many of its products, I also can observe when they are screwing the consumer on purpose (an ability that fan boys don't have, as if they win something, money, pride, from senselessly defending brands, football clubs, races, sexualities, countries, religions... enslaved beings stuck in fighting).
It is your ethical sovereign right for companies to provide the best array of technology for the money you are cashing out. They are using the resources of your planet, your fair share of the resources, that you never get btw, they manipulate the system to give you incremental upgrades, to screw you time and time again, and still you come defending them, and not even doing it with logic?!
CptPower, 08 Dec 2018Since S5 i never saw a nice looking samsung phone. Even the term of horrible or disgusting i... moreS5 was hideous what are you on about. S6 edge and S7 edge were beautiful. S8/S9 is nice too.
Kirin has about 50% advantage in the memory test (both RAM and ROM, since we don't have the breakdown). I wonder where that score comes from.