Anonymous, 09 Feb 2012the Nokia Communicator came out in 2002 with a 4.5" 640x200 resolution screen, not 800x48... morebut later communictor had the wvga res. I know the diff between dual core n dual cpu. I was just emphasizing the innovation done by nokia.
blueglue, 09 Feb 2012@james, you seem sensible. so i assume you are not considering the low level phones and the s4... moreYou can purchase the Lumia 800 off contract from Microsoft for a measly $899. I bet the Nokia Fanboys are all willing to shell out that price for a device that aside from the polycarbonate(Class 7 PLASTIC) body is identical to every other WP7 device out there.
AnonD-12210, 09 Feb 2012They were the first to use camera on a smartphne . They used dual cpus first. They introduced ... morethe Nokia Communicator came out in 2002 with a 4.5" 640x200 resolution screen, not 800x480.
You confuse having 2 separate processors and having a dual core. Nokia isn't the first to market with a "dual processor" device, they had separate RISC processors to do certain task, not the same thing. Try again.
AnonD-12210, 09 Feb 2012I know it . But still this doesnt make them any inferior bcoz still their devices can do all t... more@james, you seem sensible. so i assume you are not considering the low level phones and the s40 stuff.
wish you good luck with your convictions. personally, if i have to buy a WP7 (which i may soon)all devices would be same, there isnt much difference between lumia 800 and samsung w8530 (except for 8 MP cam) and samsung is much cheaper too(trust me way too cheaper). unbiased buyers will prefer samsung in this case, where is the nokia trdemark or so called the selling point?
[deleted post]Blueglue has some gud points too. But some fanboys here like Q8knight, android fanboy hd are proven trolls. I wonder where that 'COD3RR' Is. Man he was a heck of a troll.
[deleted post]there is aint point in letting out your frustration kid,
did i add something? No. its the same what you have said.
blueglue, 09 Feb 2012its "they were"... not "they are".. hope you got it.. I know it . But still this doesnt make them any inferior bcoz still their devices can do all the things that others do .
Jay, 09 Feb 2012Dude stop defending Android os, get a life man.
People have a right to prefer a os they like.... moreneither i trolled not did i defend android pointlessly.
if you can refer to my earlier posts, probably you can understand what my standpoint is.
just like you, even i have stated facts.
its alwaz upto the user to choose the o/s brand according to their preference, criteria. i am a User too and as ex symbian user i do have my opinios which may count or may not.
blueglue, 09 Feb 2012so you think o/s working with 680 mhz is innovation? at least they have tried till some extent... moreThey were the first to use camera on a smartphne . They used dual cpus first. They introduced 4 inch screens n 800x480 res scrêen way bäck in 2001. They inspired the idea of camcorder on a phone , n93. They somehow started slowing down after n95. They wr the most innovative brands and i feel evn today they can do it.
AnonD-12210, 09 Feb 2012Nokia has the capability öf doing new things. Remember they used dual cpu 339mhz +339mhz ... moreYes i know that, may people say Nokia don't have dual CPU, actually they started with dual CPU's in phones. And also true is that Android still can't use dual CPU correctly. It is funny that people think if they have a dual 1,4Ghz CPU running they have the best phone......LOL......i would say keep charging your battery every day twice :P
This is very very ugly design, so looking bad. Nokia should bring new attractive design for this phone.
Nokia is doing really bad nowdays...very sorry for nokia.I wish it join hands with Android.
noni, 09 Feb 2012what an ugly design its very cheap looking.i also did not really like the design. but the specification is pretty good
Jay, 09 Feb 2012First of all i am not a fanboy like you, i just say the facts. If a OS can run smooth on a 680... morewin 98 can run on 444mhz processor and needs 64 mb ram. win 7 need atleast 1 ghz processor and 1 Mb ram.
can you understand whats the difference? hope this answers your question
blueglue, 09 Feb 2012so you think o/s working with 680 mhz is innovation? at least they have tried till some extent... moreDude stop defending Android os, get a life man.
People have a right to prefer a os they like. Don't troll here that your Android is the best! Every one can choose for them selfs!
Jay, 09 Feb 2012First of all i am not a fanboy like you, i just say the facts. If a OS can run smooth on a 680... moreNokia has the capability öf doing new things. Remember they used dual cpu 339mhz +339mhz in N95. Why ? Bcoz it was needed . Now same clocked cpus are used in symbian. Do you knw , a sgs2 is a single core device 90% of the time bcoz apps are nt available to utilise dual core. Let the android fanboys dream about dual cores.
AnonD-12210, 09 Feb 2012what innovation ? If u have single core u know the nxt step, i.e dual core. If u have nhd res ... moreso you think o/s working with 680 mhz is innovation? at least they have tried till some extent to put single, dual core of cpu and HD screens to use in a mobile phones.
in fact their efforts helped nokians to get isnpired to put the same h/w to their mobiles...the lumia 900,800 etc.. etc
and btw, its not just the increse of h/w. its the premium feel and experience which has been innovative.
no if nokia had android, they wud have made it work on 480 mhz cpu , forget cores and HD screens. they wud have taken us back to monochromes.
blueglue, 09 Feb 2012oh now that you ahve opened up your eyes, i know the specs are for WP device? but it was nokia... moreFirst of all i am not a fanboy like you, i just say the facts. If a OS can run smooth on a 680Mhz CPU then why use 1,4Ghz CPU if there is no benefit in the performance, this because it will drain you battery life. I really don't think you know what you are talking about!