i agree that the design isnt stellar but that is a small price to pay for that monster of a camera.with that incredible camera any minus the phone has and any bad comment on it is simply meaningless
41MP, is just too much for a camera phone, they could have done it with the same 12 MP with improved lenses or maximum to a 18 MP, which is practical. Secondly its a single core 1.3 GHz processor and 512 MB RAM, available in may 2012, when the market is going to be flooded with dual cores and quad cores with 1GB ram on board. Who would want to buy a slower phone at the same time taking high mega pixel shots of very very large file size, strange !!! Lastly, the N8, had much better looks. I guess they said it would be for 450 euros, I would rather put my money in a Canon/Nikon DSLR. Nokia, what you guys upto???
In love with it..! Wow..! Amazing convergence device.. Hope it still does make phone calls..
Doesn't look that bad... better than I expected...
41Mpixel sensor ... for produce 5Mpixel photos ...
Maybe at redonculos 85% JPG quality as Nokia is used to store photo ...
What a joke
Certainly a noteworthy SENSOR, whats that Ugly Hump at the back?
4-incher of nHD (640 x 360) resolution..its already lost in ppi... what a shame Nokia? is this you call the symbian saviour
Anonymous, 27 Feb 2012indeed, thats why belle is so smooth, and its not battery sucker, unlike those other os's exce... moreWindows Phone?
wait ...wait..wait for it....its still early at the MWC2012. thank goodness for nokia come out 1st...consolation come out 1st then follow by the goodies...nokia stick to bella will be for the low end market from now on.. revolution set its course. u dun change.. then wait to be eliminated. ENOUGH for nokia(byebye from me to nokia anyway)....bring more news.
I think this phone could replace my camera. The price needs to be affordable though. 41 megapixels is like a very high-end DSLR. That's crazy.
the design is not ugly,why people always comments on the design and said dont want to buy it bcause its ugly.man, its 41mp not 4.1mp,for that design i think its okay..
41 mp....my head is spinning
i think that the 808 is the best bang for buck in the mobile world
sounds good. But I think nokia overtried with desigd and materials. 808 looks so cheap and plastic.. Im staying with my N8.
davix, 27 Feb 2012you don't really need much ram for symbian belle...indeed, thats why belle is so smooth, and its not battery sucker, unlike those other os's except ios, (whats the remaining os's that i did'nt said?)
The pic looks as if they used old footage of a 5230
I hope it looks way better in the actual than on pictures. They could of thought of a better design for this monster phone. What was Nokia thinking?
WTF? I was expecting 18 megapixel but this is very huge. King is coming Back!
41????????????????boom
Shoot! 41mp? Gonna faint!
I am still going to use a dslr camera!
Do you think this will compete with Canon Eos Mark IV or Canon Eos 7D or any DSLR in the market?
Still and a big absolute no for another 20 more years!
Why? This most of normal camera or camera phone DOES NOT HAVE MULTIPLE AUTOFOCUS/multipoint autofocus.
Multipoint autofocus helps to produce an absolute deep depth of field and much2 more sharper image even in absolute low lighting. DSLR cam has a 12800 iso which allow you to shoot in low light and changeable lens that has f/2 or lower to make it even more possible.
That's why Canon Eos 7D is still the king with only 18mpx, aps-c sensor size but it still have the superior 19 autofocus point, up to 28000 iso and still the best choice among professionals.
And this Nokia Pureview 41mpx sensor is still good bit still can't compete with DSLR cam.
What a Blind fanboy!
Tip us
1.9m 150k
RSS
EV
Merch
Log in I forgot my password Sign up