Had an opportunity to play with Nokia 808 PureView at MWC and was amazed by the camera performance. Its quite an innovation and due credit should be given to Nokia engineers. Also, I found belle software to be pretty smooth, at par to most Androids.
41MP and they looks like my backup phone, nokia with 2mp camera....WHAT A CRAP!
wtf, 04 Mar 2012its a mathematics more cores and Gigahertz more the benchmarks can you show me benchmarks of a... moreI support ur statement , Good example is this :
Dont Look at iPhone 4S
Just see iPhone 4 Vs Galaxy s2 on entire charts , iPhone 4 can trash poor software (2.3 gingerbread) og galaxy s2.
bottom 2 are offscreen ones , so they dont count into performance tests.
Does 41mp mean more quality or more...size??? is this a camera with phone functions or the opposite??? because it's too poor for a smartphone (under today's standards)and not too thrilling for a camera...
Android Fanboy 4.0.3, 03 Mar 2012@James Hunt would you call someone troll when he tell the truth???im here to break your myth... moreU r still in s60v3 or s60v5 era. This is belle , it has already beaten android in camera department. Btw android has never come close. It is beating android in battery backup since age. Multimedia features are also gud in symbian. C7 plays avi out of the box but galaxy ace is struggling. The only place where droid has the edge is apps. That too is not symbians fault. Symbian has been the best and still has all the capabilities to be the best.
If this was really a monster camera mediamen and camera men would use this for news coverage ? Etc.etc.. it will be just a fad.. it will come and go.. the concept and idea is good.. but it wont last.. remember sammy already made the pixon.. but it never came out good..
Ale, 04 Mar 2012I didn't say I don't own any OS, I just said that I haven't told you which one. And now I have... moreSo why dont you compare ur quad core smartphones to dell alienware or xps series. 808 is already better than most slrs and it will be proven once it is launched.
wow its a monster.such a great tech of camera .even the camera maker should be afraid of this giant camera fon as its superb for its photos..
People keep bashing symbian even its most light os that doesnt required much power.why would people think a big thing(dual core/quad core cpu) doing a great thing is such a great?hence the small thing(such symbian that doesnt required much power)that also could do same as the "big thing" could do is claimed as a bad thing?its juz like u admire a man that could lift up a sand hence an ant that could do so u dun c..
wtf, 04 Mar 2012looks like you are frustrated at once you say Symbian can't match Android in multimedia and us... moreI didn't say I don't own any OS, I just said that I haven't told you which one. And now I have to own a device using a particular OS just to admire it? You say some weird things!!!
I change my mobile phones like the weather and have owned many different formats. Of them all there is one I'll never go back to and that's symbian (and probably never blackberry either)
Now I see you wish to compare mobile Soc's to desktop hardware??? fair enough
whilst were at it why don't were compare the photo qualities of the 808 with....oh lets say a Nixon D7000 or a Canon eos 60D or something along those lines and see how they really compare.
I have already said Nokia has introduced a very impressive camera with the 808, shame they didn't use the MWC to introduce any good smartphones!
Talking about bad English?? not only is yours terrible but your logic is also flawed!
Explain this? If Symbian is so technically so superior, then why is the industry and the public abandoning it in droves?
Anonymous, 03 Mar 2012when a post about nokia appears why does all android and ios fanboys folks in to post hate spe... moreu kiddin me dude? U r confusin 'never' wid 'always'. Just take a luk at any of d posts abt android or its manufacturers. U'll find more posts from nokia bashers after half of them were deleted due to excessively rude language.
phone arena, 04 Mar 2012Are you sure its better? Please show your betchmark.its a mathematics more cores and Gigahertz more the benchmarks can you show me benchmarks of any Android phone running at 1.3 or 1.5Ghz single core processor here topic is Android vs Symbian not ARM 11 vs Nvidia Tegra 3 even if you want to compare that processing power why don't you compare it with my Alienware Desktop powered by Intel i7 3930K and Nvidia 580 GTX graphics card and see who wins
Android Fanboy 4.0.3, 03 Mar 2012@James Hunt would you call someone troll when he tell the truth???im here to break your myth... moreso according to you Symbian S60v3 is same as Symbian belle...LOL since you said you are long time symbian user, do you remember how Android donut was when it was released.
Ale, 03 Mar 2012Oh i'm sure you won't complain, not likely to happen though is it, what with symbian future be... morelooks like you are frustrated at once you say Symbian can't match Android in multimedia and usability (you admire a OS which you don't own How?) and now saying you don't own any OS and looks like your English is not good i guess, that statement simply means you got jealeous simply looking at camera specification what i was trying to say is what Android can do with multicores, Symbian can do that with single core (actually better) eg: 1.3Ghz single core is still lower than clock of many multicore processors say Nvidia tegra 3 (1.5Ghz quad cores with fifth low power core) still this phone can do 1080p Video can handle 41MP camera
I am so glad that nokia isnt using android. Just try to imagine, almost the whole mobile phone industry would be then under googles android. How sad would it be. Symbian is the best.
Lipock, 03 Mar 2012Disappointing i don't see the magic of pureview what they showed in their official review :(You realize that these are small crops of FULL 38Mp pictures right?
crop? is that a joke?...here, have a look at these awesome pictures which we cropped to be just like the standard ones....what's wrong with you, GSMArena folks?
Color me impressed!
I am currently an N8 user my main reason for purchasing of course was the stellar 12mp camera. This is a definite improvement over the already superb nu. A 41 MP, 3x loseless xoom, 1080p video record with continual autofocus, larger screen and sensor, led light as well as xenon..so great~ Truly Nokia has done an outstanding job. My next phone no contest.
It's quite an improvement from nokia. Except for N8, camera phones are not one of their fortes. For normal handphone users like me, not too bothered with surfing on the internet and downloading applications using smartphones. I'd have to fork out extra just to pay for the internet. Not all people need the internet 24 hours/day.
Camera performance, great battery life, durability and good file editors are priorities for me. Nokia,compare with Samsung/Sony, excels in the 1st three aspects. If there's great file managers included, i'll take this one in a heartbeat.