If this real performance of upcoming Exyons 9830 or 990 whatever no thanks Samsung I will stick with S10 plus Exyons 9820 even the single-core performance worst than S9 plus in geek bench 5!.
Farewell sammy, we won't be seeing each other until snapdragon comes to europe.
Can't handle a 4k? You mean a 4K screen on a Phone is a complete waste of time and resources.
That much power and still can't handle a 4K HDR screen? Pathetic.
Guys there is 2+2+4 cluster config.
This might be the score for one of the four cortex A55 cores.
Hence single core is in 400 range while last year's Exynos was in 700 range.
Anonymous, 25 Nov 2019If you compare the snapdragon 855 to the a13 in geekbench4 there is about a 50% difference in ... moreYet Apple struggles in certain real world scenarios.
Both run on different OS.
Comparing geek bench scores of one Android to other Android is okay as it will reflect in real world usage.
Same cannot be said for Android and iOS. iOS performance is bottlenecked by less RAM( in multitasking) and lower refresh rate (in games).
Anonymous, 25 Nov 2019Worse than s10 snapdragon and exynos barely any improvement Read carefully.
The scores represent the scores for the Exynos version.
Sd version will have different scores. Also, Sd865 compared to Sd855 is much like comparing A13 to A12 Bionic (similar chipset but different clock speeds or fabrication process).
I doubt this is legit. Geekbench never referrers to the motherboard of Samsung's in house soc as exynos9830 or whatever the processor number is. It always uses the keyword 'Universal' followed by the model number of the cpu. So it should be universal9830 not exynos9830. This is always the case when exynos socs are benchmarked on geekbench, it's always that keyword plus the processor's number, which in this case is 9830. So this is most certainly fake.
Finaly first new Samsung with latest android not like previous flagships which started with last year android.
Zero , 25 Nov 2019This is far worse than expecting... If their CPU performs so badly, seems that the Exynos chip... moreObviously it's an early version of hardware/software. The devices is still months away from official release.
Cyan111111, 25 Nov 2019They’re apparently lower than the scores attained by A13 Bionic. Get your facts straight pardon me.. I read scores of previous version (s10's geekbench 4 scores on googling ) and compared them to v5 of apple
Anonymous, 25 Nov 2019If you compare the snapdragon 855 to the a13 in geekbench4 there is about a 50% difference in ... moreArchitecture bias I guess... For single core apple can apparently attain higher peak performance boosts for a short while... It throttles quite severely afterwords... That IMO is a dual edged sword, It ain't good for sustained performance load
Anonymous, 25 Nov 2019If you compare the snapdragon 855 to the a13 in geekbench4 there is about a 50% difference in ... moreI see, they might be favoring one architecture to another... I'd rather see antutu if that keeps on being the case
Anonymous, 25 Nov 2019Are they not made by same developers or something? What were the changes that drove you to th... moreIf you compare the snapdragon 855 to the a13 in geekbench4 there is about a 50% difference in performance in single core, if you do that in geekbench5 it jumps up to 80% this exact same thing happened from geekbench 3 to 4, apple lead increases every time for no apparent reason
The whole Android CPU scene is in total shambles.... Better learn from Apples implementation of ARM cores.
The final production model must manage good numbers for single core, multicore. If it can push beyond 375K in antutu then it could do well.
Anonymous, 25 Nov 2019Are they not made by same developers or something?
What were the changes that drove you to th... moreThey’re apparently lower than the scores attained by A13 Bionic.
Get your facts straight
Fulljack, 25 Nov 2019wait, I thought Samsung has announced Exynos 990, successor of Exynos 9820/9825? So what is th... moreI thought they were the same as XDA said the part number was 9830. However, Samsung announced the E990 with 3 clusters, including two custom cores. Something is amiss. https://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_announces_exynos_990_with_120hz_display_support-news-39784.php
However it's common to count from 0 and not 1.