Typical newbie mistakes, took once famous name and was riding on that name past success without putting any efforts in anywhere else, now question is, will HMD will be around at 2020? :)
karoko, 04 Dec 2019Nah... I just bought the Nokia 7.2 and camera quality is really average. DxoMark just confirms... moreOk. Thanks for the info. Well, I guess not every lowranger phone is good. Of course, the days of potato cameras are far behind, but still...
Its just that DxoMark is somewhat redundant now with its bias and all so that led to me being biased too.
geek-a-contra, 04 Dec 2019dxomark? you mean that site with an english and a chinese edition? the site where the reviews ... moreYes bro! Becouse Huawei sents the phone weeks before official launch, that's why you get the review in the same day. But thinking is not your strenght.
dxomark? you mean that site with an english and a chinese edition? the site where the reviews of the huawei phones are posted in the very day of launching while the others quite a few weeks or months later? if ever... where the "compare to" picture samples are scaled differently so the pixels are shown different? with no "compare to" pictures taken in a test room scene setup, like dpreview or others use? where the weaknesses are slightly accentuated and the pros slightly diminished, when required..., just enough to shift the positions in their top...?
Meowchie, 04 Dec 2019Reviewing phones is dumber. Just buy what you want and move on.lul. At least consumers know what are the strength and weaknesses of the phone rather than reviewing useless crap front camera.
Samath N8 808 owner, 04 Dec 2019So, Nokia didn't pay up, eh? Very nice. It shows how ethical Nokia are, even today.Nah... I just bought the Nokia 7.2 and camera quality is really average. DxoMark just confirms how weak HMD is when it comes to cameras.
So, Nokia didn't pay up, eh?
Very nice. It shows how ethical Nokia are, even today.
Akashraj, 04 Dec 2019DxO mark is a joke. They prefer quantity over quality. I wonder who still refer DxO mark for b... moreagreed. but the fans of the phones having high dxomark disagree... guess what, dxomark is going where the money is...
those phones having low dxomark score doesnt need them anyway...
still, camera samples and numerous youtubers have better chances of telling accurate camera quality...
DXO Mark has recently been biased about camera performance.
And what do you expect from a sub $200-300 phone?
If you want better camera and specs then spend double, try that Samsung or iPhone.
So DxO is still a thing until now?
I don't trust them anymore though. Stop trusting them GSMArena. They only want money over quality service.
Also, reviewing selfie cameras are just plain dumb.
Why suddenly a post about the FRONT camera? Seriously, is this like an intentional post just to bad-mouth Nokia? When did we ever see DxOMark about the FRONT camera?