Anonymous, 08 Dec 2019Look at all these kids acting like camera engineers and photography pros, trying to run this p... moreI agree, personally, I would not be so much bothered about the zoom. but I spoke about the photos without the zoom. If the quality at start is terrible, how do you expect it to be any better farther off in the zoom?
Anonymous, 08 Dec 2019Look at all these kids acting like camera engineers and photography pros, trying to run this p... moreNo, that's because the photo processing quality is indeed terrible. There's no fine detail, everything is smudged as if they ran a watercolour filter over the pictures on purpose. And if you can't tell that it's bad, you're either in denial or simply don't know anything about photography yourself.
Impressive. No pic of the periscope?
Just having a beer, 07 Dec 2019I agree, the camera photos are seriously terrible. And it starts from the basic photo, if you ... moreLook at all these kids acting like camera engineers and photography pros, trying to run this phone through the mud when its not even out yet. For crying out loud, the quality of the augmented pictures might not be the best but its still freaking impressive that with all that zoom you can almost make out what's inside those offices in that building from that distance.
I agree, the camera photos are seriously terrible. And it starts from the basic photo, if you look at the white car on the bottom right corner. I mean, you can't almost make out what car that is.
Look at all these kids acting like camera engineers and photography pros, trying to run this phone through the mud when its not even out yet. For crying out loud, the quality of the augmented pictures might not be the best but its still freaking impressive that with all that zoom you can almost make out what's inside those offices in that building from that distance.
Anonymous, 06 Dec 2019BBK seems that doesn't have even a single phone that can reach the camera quality of top phone... moreYou lost all credibility, explain to me then how the oppo R17 pro ( a mid ranger with weaker isp)was top 3 in low light camera performance in 2017
Because the iPhone was without low light pictures objectively factually speaking it out performed it's competition
And top 10 in regular photography, video was meh
But let me guess as usual you made a comment and did little to no research on your comparison
BBK seems that doesn't have even a single phone that can reach the camera quality of top phones from competitors, zero Oppo, zero Vivo, zero One Plus. Maybe they should hire some new engineers for that and share the new software and tech between their brands. They must have really bad software when even alleged sensors with OIS can't even help them, about all in low light in all their brands.
Terrible photo quality. But I am guessing that is partially because the photos have been taken in poor light. And mostly because of poor hardware and software.
Oh wow that's so very awful. Here's what cropping and then pretending to make "hybrid" nonsense "zoom" pics looks like.
Wow These images are really bad and I guess I'm inclined to believe them as if it was Oppo posting them, then they would have slapped their logo on some DSLR photos and call them samples.
It still looks scary, we were waiting for the X27Pro to continue, and not a hole in the screen and such a ridiculous view of the cameras from behind, it looks shameful and will it reach the OPPO 10 Zum that came out six months ago?!...
Huawei And Vivo True Camera Kings
increased, 06 Dec 2019You know a feature is useless when even the manufacturer samples look like garbageUseless and garbage? That's so impressive
What's the point of shooting something 200-300 m away if quality becomes awful.
As bad as 1.5MP photo?
You know a feature is useless when even the manufacturer samples look like garbage
Tip us
1.9m 150k
RSS
EV
Merch
Log in I forgot my password Sign up