Galaxy S20 dummies shown on video, the Ultra has a bigger camera bump Comments
- someone
- Bct
Whackcar, 24 Jan 2020The Ultra is way oversized, and expected to be heavy as well. Would be extremely uncomfortable... moreIn 2020 you are expecting to use phones in one hand ???? .. lol u should have left that one handed use way back in 2017
- someone
- Bct
Barricade, 24 Jan 2020Did you mix up the width of the S20 and S20+? Doesn't seem right that the larger one is narrow... moreExactly. The width is swapped i guess.
- someone
- Bct
Anonymous, 24 Jan 2020That is not true:
S20 151 x 69 x 7.7mm 164g or S10 Lite 162.5 x 75.6 x 8.1 mm 186g vs "S... moreYour interpretation is not true
S20 => S10
S20+ => S10+
S20 Ultra => S10 5G
S10 e equivalent is not there in S20 series.
- Anonymous
- 0Wh
AnonD-889996, 24 Jan 2020The screen got bigger but not the phone size, thanks to almost maximized screen-to-body ratioThat is not true:
S20 151 x 69 x 7.7mm 164g or S10 Lite 162.5 x 75.6 x 8.1 mm 186g vs "S10e 142.2 x 69.9 x 7.9 mm 150g"
S20+ 161 x 73 x 7.7mm 188g vs "S10 149.9 x 70.4 x 7.8 mm 157g"
S20 Ultra 166 x 76 x 8.9mm 221g vs "S10+ 157.6 x 74.1 x 7.8 mm 175g"
Each time bigger, heavier and less comfortable to carry and handling. And also more ugly too plus cutting features while increasing prices. Samsung assuming the Apple style.
- AnonD-889996
- KiD
Fritz, 24 Jan 2020Dont like the sizes of them! Every year phones become bigger and bigger. The screen got bigger but not the phone size, thanks to almost maximized screen-to-body ratio
- AnonD-889996
- KiD
blue.sun, 24 Jan 2020This is by far the most ugly of "S" series... And after all those years no "sub 150" phone. Go... moreEvery new phone with many cameras look ugly. This is less eye-sore than 11 Pro but less stylish than Mate 30
- S Yu
- tLG
indlvarn, 24 Jan 2020I would buy S20 if it had a jack...Me too, any of the trio with the jack (or a second C port, not unreasonable to ask for in the huge Ultra) in fact. Dealbreaker.
- blue.sun
- 0CN
This is by far the most ugly of "S" series... And after all those years no "sub 150" phone. Go to hell, Samsung.
- AnonD-771260
- Yca
indlvarn, 24 Jan 2020I would buy S20 if it had a jack...Good to know. Thank you for updating us.
[deleted post]I actually would do so indeed.. I had Samsung in the past, but looking at the most recent devices, I'm not missing it...
That bump is sooooooooo ugly.. its like Pixel: My bump was really bad idea.. Samsung: Hold my beer...
- a-a-a
- 3{I
Anonymous, 24 Jan 2020No it wouldn't, one UI is designed for one handed usage. Plus weight distribution will be eve... moreNo it won't, every ui is build to use one hand stretching the screen to one angle... if that is one handed, so no it won't and it will weight... try to read some book before going bed for 1/2 hours and then you'll see. (s8, s10, note 5 pro and redmi note 7 some of previous device i owned/own, you can tell and feel the difference)
- BigDisplay
- mbW
Anonymous, 24 Jan 2020No it wouldn't, one UI is designed for one handed usage. Plus weight distribution will be eve... moreAgree (Y)
- Anonymous
- KSu
Whackcar, 24 Jan 2020The Ultra is way oversized, and expected to be heavy as well. Would be extremely uncomfortable... moreNo it wouldn't, one UI is designed for one handed usage.
Plus weight distribution will be even which will make it surprisingly comfortable to handle.
- Barricade
- JDp
Did you mix up the width of the S20 and S20+? Doesn't seem right that the larger one is narrower than the smaller one.
- GregLu
- nRg
Anonymous, 24 Jan 2020Something is wrong. Board says S20 is shorter but wider than S20+. Actually they inverted S20 and S20+ yes, because it's 68 and 74 for S20/S20+ ;)
- AnonD-754814
- ubI
I think the phone dimensions have been altered in the given chart. Exchanged between S20 and 20+
Tip us
1.9m 150k
RSS
EV
Merch
Log in I forgot my password Sign up