AnonD-50755, 20 Apr 2012It looks like a crap,, I won't buy it and all Americans should wait for pureview. Despite the ... moreReally?just by looking at it u say its ugly?Dont judge the book by its cover.ugly on the outside good on the inside.Even Xperia has funny design,but the user experience is great.
Hey, am i the only noticing that this phone luks too small to b 4.6in. judging by the size of the palm in which it is held in the image? I think this the galaxy m with 4in screen. It luks identical as well to that leaked galaxy m image. These specs too except for the quadcore bit seem to b the ones that hav been previously leaked for galaxy m.
lol where is 2gb of ram? 12mp camera? full﻿ hd screen? Rumours :@
It looks like a crap,, I won't buy it and all Americans should wait for pureview. Despite the bad operating system of Nokia, they still have legend phones. Hurry up Nokia and release the pureview.
Samsung has always been at risk in producing the SIII. There is very little new technology it can pack into the mobile that is not already available. It likely people will be expecting too much from Samsung and will be disappointed with their top end product development. Part of the problem has been the release of far too many small hardware upgrades of existing mobiles, and little real advancement with ICS. Samsung is entering into the "bottle neck" where they will not be able to meet continuing expectations and earnings will plateau.
Anonymous, 20 Apr 2012pureview 808 is better than this.lolPure Fail you mean
What kind of company makes a phone that thick just for low quality Camera and puts 38MP to fool the public? I bet anyone can't carry it freely because its like a brick very thick an heavy
Galaxy Note 8MP beats this 808 any day in Camera quality just wait it to release to make comparisons
What a joke second quarter of 2012 and Nokia releases single core old ARM CPU with no GPU phone LOL and 640X360 resolution! You can't even view the pics in normal quality joke resolution and dead OS by Nokia itself said Symbian will be good roughly to 2013 unless they want to abandon WP
While the rest HD resolution and quad core and great camera quality not MP
4.7" screen.. please compensate for the pixels used in the bottom for controls..
if this phone is not galaxy SIII then i will find those guys who made that video and ask them one thing "why why you made me feel bad about SIII for 2 weeks"
AnonD-1846, 20 Apr 2012Not the battery only Moto made the first water proof android phone Defy and the first water pr... moreI am not talking about who were the first now. I know about the Defy. I just said if the previous S3 rumors are true, it will beat the Razr HD. The S3 is rumored to be waterproof(as the Razr HD), it's rumored to have an eye tracking system(which is unique to Samsung), it's rumored to have a 12 MP camera(as the Razr HD), it's also rumored to have a Wireless charging capability. And if all these are true, the S3 is going to beat the Razr HD, but maybe only half of those rumors are real. We will see everything on 3Th of May.
Anonymous, 20 Apr 2012pureview 808 is better than this.lolMight as well go for a DSLR instead.why waste time if u want a phone just for its "amazing" camera and dual core spec?im using a singled core phone and it fills my daily needs.
Anonymous, 20 Apr 2012pureview 808 is better than this.lolSeems you got a low standard! Poor kid
According to this site, this is the Galaxy M, and Samsung will announce not only one phone.
AnonD-44227, 20 Apr 2012if you're cameraphone minded you'll be disappointed like me it looks like basing on those supp... moreStop trolling ok? we ain't give a shit about your damn poorview this is a Samsung thread so if you don't have to say something useful then shut up.