Mike, 14 May 2012Dude, I don't mind having a HD screen, but that kind of resolution is best suited for Computer... moreamoled display is fit for mobile phones only not for tvs , computers and laptops .if u have seen the live phone then write the comment on dat kk pls pls
AnonD-24171, 14 May 2012100% right
Nokia fanboys lie all the time to make Nokia looks better but they can't anymore w... moresay whatever but its not worth 30k.
lumia 800 launched at 30k and in a month its price is 22k,the sales speak for themselves.
The best Symbian device ever, even trumps most quadcore Androids out there.
[deleted post]Dude, I don't mind having a HD screen, but that kind of resolution is best suited for Computers, Laptops and TVs. It's a bit pointless stuffing that kind of resolution into a screen that isn't even 5 inches. It may make content look good, but why would i want my phone to give my laptop competition in the screen department? 854 x 480 is more acceptable.
Plus when it comes to battery draining, all those phones you mentioned were Windows Phone (which is definitely a battery drainer) and Meego, not symbian. Try using a phone like Nokia e6 and then compare.
If you don't like it, dont buy it. Dont simply bash it because other people like it and want to buy it.
[deleted post]I agree Samsung has way better hardware with galaxy III... but over a year, you'll end selling your phone with almost 50% price drop since the next galaxy will be upgraded with may be six core CPU, 2gb ram, 2500mah battery etc.
Even battery is non issue for Samsung android phones. Even if you are heavy cellphone user, you can buy bigger battery from eBay with back cover. For example l, my friend got 3600 mah battery in his galaxy nexus. That phone had 1800 mah battery. Since Samsung has slimmer phone. Bigger battery does make them that fat.
Nokia has nHD resolution for preview and his all 640x360 resolution phones. That can let you play 1280x720p videos smoothly. I have experienced it with Nokia n8. NHD resolution only helps saving battery. Bcz bigger the resolution gets, more data is acquired for display. That consume a lot of battery.
Nokia n8 has amazing camera till date. I have played with 16mp cameraphone of HTC. But it's no match. With preview, you can take 3 mp, 5 mp, and 8 mp picture.. Also you can take 38mp picture as well. You won't loose details in any resolution.
I am only waiting for Nokia lumia pureview. I now find WP os more friendly. And besides Nokia is killing Symbian os by 2016.
blueglue, 14 May 2012Dude, You talk too much sense. Its not acceptable in Nokia forums. You wont get a suitable rep... morehttp://www.flickr.com/photos/nokiaofficial/7194427490/sizes/o/in/set-72157629720107168/
[deleted post]is there something wrong with you or you are 8 years old? Nokia 808 is simply great phone.
OS - very ok. No much apps like for android but, for me, i have all i need, 80% is already build in to the OS (sat nav, great gps software you can only dream to have it on Android), good sync software,.,...
excellent photos you cant achieve on other mobile phones and all that on a great price!!!!
AnonD-24171, 14 May 2012100% right
Nokia fanboys lie all the time to make Nokia looks better but they can't anymore w... morehttp://topolino70.kuvat.fi/kuvat/Nokia%20808%20Images/
Cry me a river while I enjoy these images.
Sing me a lullaby to go with this video.
[deleted post]Dude, You talk too much sense. Its not acceptable in Nokia forums. You wont get a suitable reply, keeping in mind you still have not touched the "omnipotent" o/s and futuristic h/w
41 MP camera......better to buy DSLR or any camera.... No android means this phone is waste....Nokia try to come out with some innovating products...better to buy any smartphone rather than spending thousands of buck!
[deleted post]100% right
Nokia fanboys lie all the time to make Nokia looks better but they can't anymore with new GSMarena compare section.
Wait for Lumia pure view phones...I thought of buying HTC one X /Galaxy S3....but now planned to w8 till Win Phone-8 comes out.I think that will add a HD screen with a multi core processor and with Pure view sensor and poly carbonate chassis it will be a beast....Pricing should be some where between 30-34K in India :P
Nokia should price this phone very aggressively and market it like their lives depend on it. Screw lumia. I have metro UI on my droid (launcher 7) and i can get it on belle (windows phone 7 emulator). To me android and belle are the best OSes, apps aside. Nokia please take this device seriously
Wow what another ugly and pointless phone from nokia.No one cares about how many mega pixels the camera has.Its a flawed operating system and if nokia think the pooview will rescue them then think again.Epicfail
AnonD-50935, 14 May 201230k for a phone which has nothing than a awesome camera???? :O i'm not buying this phone with ... moreWell then don't buy it. We will buy it. And enjoy it.
So there. Enjoy your laggy beta OS phone with a camera that sucks. Bring an extra battery with you. :-p