Samsung Galaxy A71 gets disappointing DxOMark camera score Comments
- wasox
- 8V}
hmm, 10 Apr 2020Sammy wins mostly only from the dumb people who buy it for the brand name and have no clue wha... moreWell, that is, for people who counts coins, usually, real premium flagships offer the best of the best in all aspects, performance, support, materials, craftmanship, features, looks, etc
- Anonymous
- NL{
Jaeger, 10 Apr 2020Actually, the user has the final say. Doesn't matter if the camera is good or bad objectively.... moreA user could be satisfied with a VGA too.... doesn't mean that tests are faulty
- hmm
- m2J
chats, 10 Apr 2020Thats their opinion! But it goes down to personal preference, I do not own an A71 but I had th... moreSammy wins mostly only from the dumb people who buy it for the brand name and have no clue what so ever about what they get for it. And these competition lose mostly cause they are compared with same specs and not the price point. Same specs phones cost 2-3 times less then this A71 as for the A71 price you get flagship specs devices from other competition. People who understand the hardware value over brand value will go with the lower price flagship and dont care about what brand sticker it has on
- Anonymous
- 331
Anonymous, 10 Apr 2020Not disappointing. What's disappointing is that gsmarena still reports about Dxomark results. ... moreExactly. Finally someone said it!
- Phones fan
- XG4
NotAnOpinion, 10 Apr 2020Ha-ha! Prepare for the worst s20 Ultra score on DxOMARK! Wanna bet, family?I think they want to give Samsung ultra good results, because they didn't do the tests while the early software showed autofocus and colour problems.
- Anonymous
- XFT
PartTimePhoner, 10 Apr 2020I dunno about y'all but same configuration xiaomi and samsung phones cost the same here (for s... moreCanada?
- PartTimePhoner
- 3xw
Anonymous, 10 Apr 2020Costing less than half money? Of course that yes. A lot better value for your money. You also ... moreI dunno about y'all but same configuration xiaomi and samsung phones cost the same here (for some reason).
128/8 A71 costs around the same with 128/6 Mi9T (and mi9T is 1 year older). Though I aint in america so.....
- Anonymous
- 3gE
PartTimePhoner, 10 Apr 2020DxOmark lost it. Giving A50 85 and A71 84. (Xiaomi fanboys, before you ahit talk, Note 8 P... moreCosting less than half money? Of course that yes. A lot better value for your money. You also get the support from community with them. For pay something as overpriced as these ones i'll buy a previous year flagship of something from Honor, Meizu, even Asus. A lot better that these plastic junk and with proper cameras. The Honor 30 Pro will dance in circles around this crap phones.
- Anonymous
- gBV
Not disappointing. What's disappointing is that gsmarena still reports about Dxomark results. This misleads customers. No reliable reviewer would rate cameras by assigning a subjective number to them.
- DroidBoye
- vaQ
Jaeger, 10 Apr 2020Actually, the user has the final say. Doesn't matter if the camera is good or bad objectively.... moreSo you think that it is fine that a test designed to be as objective as possible is to be treated as an opinion as soon as it defies their subjective beliefs? There's the problem, I've said it as obvious as it could be. Your generic notions doesn't even tackle my whole point but yeah, you're right but you've missed the whole subject.
- Anonymous
- tVq
I mean it's a plastic phone. So, no doubt the score as plastic as delusional sammy fanboy think theirs phone superior. lol
- PartTimePhoner
- 3xw
Jaeger, 10 Apr 2020Double standard has become commonplace here, especially when it comes to cameras. And the funn... moreYea I dont get that part either why formsocial media?
- Jaeger
- GFr
PartTimePhoner, 10 Apr 2020DxOmark lost it. Giving A50 85 and A71 84. (Xiaomi fanboys, before you ahit talk, Note 8 P... moreDouble standard has become commonplace here, especially when it comes to cameras. And the funny part is most users take photos for social media.
- Anonymous
- I@a
People still believe DxOMark? They collaborate with phone manufacturers to help the latter know how to improve camera ratings in DxOMark's own tests. That's serious conflict of interest! Scoring and weighting methods are never transparent and constantly change. Addition of multiple cameras especially telephoto can increase the rating even if the main camera is lacking in image quality. That's why top notch phones alternate between Apple, Samsung, Huawei, Google, repeat cycle. If you want real camera quality tests, ignore DxOMark. Better go for gsmarena's photo compare tool and judge for yourself based on 100% crops. It's more reliable than looking at DxOMark's dubious camera rating system that favors generous sponsors by collaborating with them to help improve the scores.
- Jaeger
- GFr
DroidBoye, 10 Apr 2020Your comment is in fact an opinion but standardized tests weren't. IF you are to refute a well... moreActually, the user has the final say. Doesn't matter if the camera is good or bad objectively. If the user is satisfied with the results, who are we to say otherwise?
- PartTimePhoner
- 3xw
DxOmark lost it. Giving A50 85 and A71 84.
(Xiaomi fanboys, before you ahit talk, Note 8 Pro got 84 too. Dont go saying things like "yea of course they got low scores aha" before saying "DxOmark is unreliable" on another article)
- DroidBoye
- vaQ
chats, 10 Apr 2020Thats their opinion! But it goes down to personal preference, I do not own an A71 but I had th... moreYour comment is in fact an opinion but standardized tests weren't. IF you are to refute a well established test procedure, maybe you could start pointing out which part of their test is faulty? You're delusional when you think that your own preference were far superior than the results of these tests.
- PartTimePhoner
- 3xw
Anonymous, 10 Apr 2020For the price of A71 you can get S10e or S10.I dont know where you got that from. S10 is exactly 2x the price of A71 here.
Tip us
1.9m 150k
RSS
EV
Merch
Log in I forgot my password Sign up