it looks like an upgrade version of 1200..
but the design looks cheap ..
hey dumb people! i agree that this phone is somewhat ugly.. yes it is.. and that has a reason! nokia made it ugly for it to sell cheaper! if they made it good looking and having all those features then it would be more expensive! thats is a very simple logic! u dont even understand... the point is, nokia is making OPTIONS... if u don't like this phone option(3120 classic) and wanted some good looking phones then 8XXX and some Nseries will be ur best choice! perhaps there are some phones on this price range which are better looking than this phone but offers less features! it's all about marketing! don't u get it!???? u should be a more considerate enough consumer!
16mln screen,vga recording,3g,2mp camera,Cheap price- which phone has?none.
best seller for sure
people people.........this fone is all round a great package 4 the price.u are getting 3G, 2MP camera,MP3, radio and loads more.try and find a fone that gives u all this at a cheaper price!The best part of all is that they did not compremise on the build quality.I am personally NOT a nokia fan, but this fone is a good product, and will sell.
so bad design same look like samsung now nokia become copy cat
Ugly as only a Nokia or a SE can be.
damn, wat a bad design.
Nokia hav done it again.
n95,n82, and now, dis one...
i guess they shud hire designers frm SE or Moto or Samsung!!!
Hmm.. not bad for a mid-end! at least it has a QVGA 16M screen & VGA recording..
It is official. Nokia is synonymous with boring designs.
it's the worst design from nokia.it looks so cheap
Sucks big time but not bad for economical use :)
everything is good except the shape... bleh look at the bottom part!
"does it OS S60 3rd ???"
simply and slimy the best
does it OS S60 3rd ???
nokia sucks at design... this one... n82, n95, n93, n91 only confirm this...
i want one. my lg kg320 sucks.
design - sucks! verry cheap..