Whatchasay, 24 May 2012You're almost right. Samsung can be compared to HTC, Moto, and LG. But not Apple. Don't fla... morein terms of bragging rights, probably apple is better but in terms of technology, samsung and other phone manufacturers are out of reach by apple
Oh Well,Iphone Is probaly the Best But They are loosing it now in front of the Android guys..
how much a Company can invest (Iphone) with( May be with Trillions dollars) limited resourses in front of a open source one..
BLA BLA... I Have Been using Nokia Symbian For a Long time Now..Recently Purchased an IPhone,Well You need to Use an Iphone to Praise An Iphone....Its Awesome..
Waiting for the IOS6 now:-p
geof, 24 May 2012just got a nokia n8 a few weeks ago & couldn't believe how good it works because i kept re... moreThat's what I thought too when I got the N8 a couple years back. It was nice for the first couple of weeks and after that I got really bored of it and doesn't do what I need.
Polai, 24 May 2012i hope nokia would come up with a phone that has an android OS.not in this lifetime
Sky Guy, 24 May 2012So pureview ICS? Pleasepleaseplease?in your dreams
An entry level device with asha like specifications
A la motorola zine zn5
what?, 25 May 2012SIII has no mass storage? Lol read the specs of the phone before you comment lolRead the review first. :-P
"USB. For some reason Android 4 no longer features the USB Mass Storage mode and only has MTP and PTP modes left.
USB version 2.0, file transfer rate 25 Mb/s.
The phone cannot have a Bluetooth and a USB connection simultaneously. When the phone s connected to a PC via USB it prompts you to turn off BT disregarding whether the phone is synced with PC or there is an ongoing file transfer which is really a downer. The battery is charging when the phone is connected via USB.
The microUSB port supports the MHL standard which means that it can be connected to a TV’s HDMI-in. This solution is a lot more convenient than a separate miniHDMI slot on the phone.
The phone also supports EDGE class 12 in GSM networks."
if pureview is compatible with android ICS... Minimum hardware is 4GB RAM.... 3.1GHz processor quad core.... iNvidia GeForce 2GB graphic RAM.... To perform.....
Android platform is too cheap compare to symbian.... Symbian require vvery less ram to perform
Whatchasay, 24 May 2012You're almost right. Samsung can be compared to HTC, Moto, and LG. But not Apple. Don't fla... moreapple sucks! no bluetooth,low battery life. HTC has better resolution,better touch sensors.
Nokia was good manufacturer. But now its way behind in term of specs and technology. Some of you may think still can cope with it and not thinking about high specs, but market says different. Its not only about specs but also about brand. Their brand value is just getting worst in customer eyes now. People start to think nokia as a low end manufacturer, and its really bad for nokia image. Marketer shud know this. If they dont change it fast, soon will be doom
all big compnies are ripoff. by china phones same thing one third price ..
OK listen up blind (nokia/android/ios) fanboys. Symbian, or whatever Nokia decide to call it, isn't going anywhere for another 2 years. Whether Nokia actually release new handsets running the old platform is questionable to say the least, but as a research and development tool it's still alive and kicking.
The Pureview 808 is likely to be Nokia's last Symbian powered device, whether we like it or not. Sad as this may be, it's time to close the first chapter of this epic tale and begin writing the next. But do not despair young readers, because there are many, many more stories of intrigue to come.
[deleted post]I know!! Haha. What an embarrassment for Samsung. Apple uses Samsung's tech to make a massive profit that Samsung can only dream of. In the end the package matters more than the parts and Apple makes a better package than Samsung any day of the week.
These new and upcoming PureView phones would HAVE to have Windows Phone.
Nokia has cancelled all future Symbian updates (Carla and Donna).
I am developing aps for both android and Symbian and I can tell you that Symbian is much faster at doing tasks than android, native code vs interpreted java code. So, symbian is faster with less resources, this I call optimized OS. Altough Symbian has microkernel that helps the os while on low ram, while androi uses linux, monolitic kernel not microkernel. This means that the hole kernel is loaded into memory, that is why android requires huge RAM. I can say that Symbian Belle is even more easyer tu use than androi, more organized, android is a little messy, as many interfaces as android manufactures. Nokia was late im developing a nice ui but they did it with belle, only thing that symbian requires now to be the king again is higher resolution and that is possible too, with Qy, at least! BTW, I'm writting this from my Nokia C7 with Belle!