GSMArena.com GSMArena.com

Tip us

1.5m
109k
RSS

EV

Merch

Log in

Login

I forgot my password
Sign up
  • Home
  • News
  • Reviews
  • Videos
  • Featured
  • Phone Finder
  • Deals
  • MerchNew
  • Coverage
  • Contact
ADVERTISEMENTS

DxOMark scored the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip right below the iPhone XS Comments

  • Read
  • Post your comment

  • Post your comment
Pages: «1 2 3 »
Sort by:

K4
  • Kits
  • LCp
  • 01 May 2020

nobody cares about dxomark lol

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
T394151
  • ThunderCrackR
  • SvB
  • 01 May 2020

Isn't the score lower than those other phones also because it lacks a camera, the telephoto one? Isn't DxO scoring each type of them then summing up? Of course it is lower, it lacks part of the score. Doesn't mean the other two cameras are that bad.

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
S43512388
  • Shui8
  • KZK
  • 01 May 2020

Jake420, 01 May 2020If Samsung 'paid' at all it would pay for the highest positions like other companies did not t... moreSo you think Samsung is very pure not to pay DxO even when they got the money? That BS lol. Every company invest on marketing dept, for bussiness. What about last year Note 10? On the top for a month, remember? The way i sees it, when some favourite brands on the top, its okay. But when its not, accusing DxO are paid higher. Thats just childish.

And its not about being better hardware or not. The fail part on Samsung S20 Ultra camera are on its software (mainly Nonacell technique, with no DPAF) where now been updated over & over again in order to improve.

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
S43512388
  • Shui8
  • KZK
  • 01 May 2020

Jake420, 01 May 2020It actually did till the S20 series no see comparisons between mate 30 and iPhone 11 pro max,t... moreWell, not to my eyes. Samsung always creates blue color cast on skies & shadows when there is none. Including S20 series.

And theres something about its strong reddish tones.

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
J12838
  • Jake420
  • r3a
  • 01 May 2020

Aldwin123, 01 May 2020I know and I feel that DxOMark is somewhat fishy.. but considering that there are only two cam... moreGreat point there but I know for a fact dxomark isn't trustworthy and you're better off using amateur YouTube comparisons than paid professionals

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
J12838
  • Jake420
  • r3a
  • 01 May 2020

Shui8, 01 May 2020If it turns out like that, then S20 Ultra score will be way lower than now. Every flagship sen... moreIf Samsung 'paid' at all it would pay for the highest positions like other companies did not to be placed under last year's phone or under the mi 10 pro which both software and hardware are last year's and miles below that of the S20 ultra

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
J12838
  • Jake420
  • r3a
  • 01 May 2020

Shui8, 01 May 2020Wait what? I thought Samsung image processing got the most color oversaturation than other com... moreIt actually did till the S20 series no see comparisons between mate 30 and iPhone 11 pro max,then iPhone 11 pro max Vs S20 ultra.Iphone generally delivers truest to life images until the S20 ultra actually gets it more accurate-"even attested by max weinbach on his Twitter" or simply watch mr.whostheboss comparisons of p30 or mate 30 Vs other phones they made clear oceans look deep blue many more

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
?
  • Anonymous
  • XRg
  • 01 May 2020

Anonymous, 01 May 2020Funny how dxo staff says their s20 ultra did not show any AF issues, unlike all retail units. Coz the autofocus issues are already fixed. AUTOFOCUS might be slower compared to the one on regular S20 or Find X2 pro or p40 pro, but those issues have been fixed.

  • Rating1 |
  • Reply
  • Report
N8621
  • Noncy
  • r39
  • 01 May 2020

Seems Samsung didn't pay good money this year

  • Rating1 |
  • Reply
  • Report
67502393
  • YUKI93
  • KZK
  • 01 May 2020

I got to be honest, the camera has never been my concern about the Z Flip. It's about sheer compact portability.

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
?
  • Anonymous
  • ke}
  • 01 May 2020

Duck of death, 01 May 2020This is how much I googled camera reviews for the Galaxy Z Flip before buying it: (none) No o... morePsh that’s how I purchase my phones. Camera is my least worries

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
A27572
  • Aldwin123
  • Kg{
  • 01 May 2020

I know and I feel that DxOMark is somewhat fishy.. but considering that there are only two camera on the Z flip, maybe 105 points is enough... Although why does it got low autofocus when the processing and hardware is the same with the S10 family which the S10+ plus got higher autofocus (97) than the Z flip (88)

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
S43512388
  • Shui8
  • KZK
  • 01 May 2020

Duck of death, 01 May 2020This is how much I googled camera reviews for the Galaxy Z Flip before buying it: (none) No o... moreYou got a point there. Z Flip was never about the camera. The Flippin' thing is.

  • Rating1 |
  • Reply
  • Report
D2870842
  • Duck of death
  • m2B
  • 01 May 2020

Shui8, 01 May 2020If it turns out like that, then S20 Ultra score will be way lower than now. Every flagship sen... moreThis is how much I googled camera reviews for the Galaxy Z Flip before buying it: (none)
No one buys the Z Flip for its camera, no one buying it cares if it's a top 50 camera or not.

  • Rating1 |
  • Reply
  • Report
S43512388
  • Shui8
  • KZK
  • 01 May 2020

Anonymous, 01 May 2020I probably has same AF of S10, but got 88. Ultra has the weakest AF of all phones since 2010,... moreIf it turns out like that, then S20 Ultra score will be way lower than now. Every flagship sent to DxO likely have the same amount of quotation to be paid. All that lab & studio test, outdoor 1500 pics tested, was not a free service.

Now because of the payment involvement, I think both DxO & Samsung made an agreement to reveal the score a bit late (will affect sales if early) with additional score on its AF more than it should. At least DxO give face to Samsung instead put it on the bottom of the earth lol.

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
3738802
  • vrvly
  • g5f
  • 01 May 2020

Well, its not mateX where did they consider camera performance and not made it half thick for sensors.

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
S43512388
  • Shui8
  • KZK
  • 01 May 2020

Jake420, 01 May 2020Dxomark also scored the S20 ultra lower than the Huawei mate 30 pro 5g which is oversaturated ... moreWait what? I thought Samsung image processing got the most color oversaturation than other company, up until today.

The only Huawei over the top colors are on P20 series.

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
?
  • Anonymous
  • 0p}
  • 01 May 2020

Funny how dxo staff says their s20 ultra did not show any AF issues, unlike all retail units.

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
?
  • Anonymous
  • uH}
  • 01 May 2020

Yee, 01 May 2020I'm curious how much did Samsung pay for this?!$0

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
M738228
  • MadMel
  • d%{
  • 01 May 2020

details are low, autofocus is slow, all said Z camera is bad.

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
  • Post your comment
Pages: «1 2 3 »
Sort by:

ADVERTISEMENTS

Phone finder

  • Samsung
  • Apple
  • Huawei
  • Nokia
  • Sony
  • LG
  • HTC
  • Motorola
  • Lenovo
  • Xiaomi
  • Google
  • Honor
  • Oppo
  • Realme
  • OnePlus
  • vivo
  • Meizu
  • BlackBerry
  • Asus
  • Alcatel
  • ZTE
  • Microsoft
  • Vodafone
  • Energizer
  • Cat
  • Sharp
  • Micromax
  • Infinix
  • TCL
  • Ulefone
  • Tecno
  • BLU
  • Acer
  • Wiko
  • Panasonic
  • Plum

All brands Rumor mill

ADVERTISEMENTS

Related articles

  • Samsung confirms the Galaxy Note20 and Fold 2 launches on track for H2 2020
  • Samsung to deliver a 250MP sensor
  • Samsung working on Exynos 992 for the Note20 lineup
  • Samsung Q1 results shows increased smartphone profits despite COVID-19

DAILY DEALS

These are the best offers from our affiliate partners. We may get a commission from qualifying sales.
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
128GB 8GB RAM $ 347.00
$ 321.00
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
128GB 6GB RAM $ 228.00
$ 215.00
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
128GB 6GB RAM $ 228.00
$ 215.00
Sony Xperia 1 IV
256GB 12GB RAM £ 1,578.00
£ 1,298.99
Show all deals
ADVERTISEMENTS

Home News Reviews Compare Coverage Glossary FAQ RSS feed Youtube Facebook Twitter Instagram

© 2000-2022 GSMArena.com Mobile version Android app Tools Contact us Merch store Privacy Terms of use Change Ad Consent Do not sell my data