ObeerbongKenobi, 14 Jun 2020Why would you pay $600.00 for this phone when you can buy a iqoo z1 with a dimensity 1000 for ... moreLol please, they are in a completely different tier altogether. Don't expect similar camera hardware as that iQOO.
Yes, the X50 Pro costs almost as much as the X50 Pro+. But the gimbal OIS is definitely a world's first, I don't mind about the SD765 chipset as I'm not a heavy user who loves to game on mobile.
Whackcar, 14 Jun 2020These Vivo phones are much more admirable than their Oppo counterparts. Find X2 & Find X2 ... moreCouldn't agree more.
The design and full-screen display along with flagship specs was what could have justified oppo's high price. Now everybody is ditching the pop-up camera and going backwards(putting a punch hole).
vrvly, 14 Jun 2020Not really, I thought its the basic feature until they came and introduced futuristic bluetoot... moreheadphone jack and touchscreen was a trend because of Steve Job and Tim Cook kill headphone jack
Why would you pay $600.00 for this phone when you can buy a iqoo z1 with a dimensity 1000 for $330? Basically twice as much for half the performance.
The X50 pro+ won because it offered better value for money compared to the vanilla OnePlus 8 and the massively overpriced Find X2 Pro. The X50 Pro stood no chance, flagship soc and better main sensor are always going to win vs a feature that might turn out to be nothing but gimmick. As for X50, it's ridiculous to pay that amount of money for a normal mid-ranger just because it has 5G.
Wait, why would I want a vivo x50 pro+, when I can get a vivo X50 pro+++ super ultimate Ultra HDR Lamborghini Edition 8G?
World's most popular brand smartphone company vivo
Sir please bing powerbank
These Vivo phones are much more admirable than their Oppo counterparts. Find X2 & Find X2 Pro were far costlier (yes some of their specs were better, but nothing groundbreaking). These Vivo offerings bring good value to the smartphone space.
annoying customer, 14 Jun 2020you are too needyNot really, I thought its the basic feature until they came and introduced futuristic bluetooth portability but also "quality".
Thats may be also the reason why phone sales stagnate after start of jack-less trend around 2015.
vrvly, 14 Jun 2020Couldn't afford the jack, too premium feature now.you are too needy
I been sick toxic phone user the person who want everything read the comments on the android user worst then iso user
This proving my point more phone user that needy the hurting market forever one
Crackling Doom, 14 Jun 2020Not for me. Small screen (I prefer 7 inches and over) and lack of headphone jack is a deal bre... moreI also want 7 inch phone with super amoled screen, don't need high end chipset, 765G will enough. But 3.5 jack, and bigger battery is must. And most important price under 370$
Anyone saw the video of the "gimbal"? It's horrible. In fact, it performs better with the gimbal feature turned off than turned on. Not worth the money or the time.
Anonymous, 14 Jun 2020This hardware+Stock Android = Instant sales !Not for me. Small screen (I prefer 7 inches and over) and lack of headphone jack is a deal breaker for me.
All of these omit the 3.5, so the path to my heart drops off a cliff
The hardware is awesome apart from the SoC.
Vivo could have used SD855 instead of the 765G for the Pro and 765G for the Vanilla.