well thnk alot to SE dat dey produce gr8 fone like w910
a huge shame on LG and SAMSUNG dat they put 5MP in front of MP walkman n still lose the competition shame all of u
some people r comparing n95 with other mobile. hey ppl have u used it? i have for 2 months. its a brick i would say.wat am i gonna do with so many functions if i don't have a battery stand by?
finally old it and switched over to k810i, simply lovable.a winner for me..
ur saying that w 910 is fast yep it must be cuz compared to nokia it got very very low options that is a few years ago but wait a second now that nokia even got faster performance and faster responding time handsets even without dropping the wide range of options that s.e. doesn't have ... take a look at the nokia 5700 , nokia 5610 , nokia 6500 slider , nokia 6500 classic , nokia n81 , nokia 6110 nav etc. those handsets are really good on there prizes and offers well balanced options with speed performance big amount of applications and smart and kool designs plus 2 mp and 3.2 mp or higher cameras with either flasher or dual led flash and the music capabilities and options those phones offers are the best and they aint even comes under high over prized prize tags ... take a good look at those phones that im comparing to the s.e. w 910 ... im not comparing the nokia n 95 i know those phones aint a match cuz n 95 is far ahead in everything so as the newly released n 96 ... and then again lets talk about s.e. walkman w850 , w580 , w888 , s500 , w960 , k810 , k850 ,w890 those judges must use those phones i have mentioned cuz definitely they would have given the award to one of those s.e. or nokia phones and w910 is nothing compared to those phones and there prizes ... its the biggest shame of the mobile world ... the shame of giving an award to an unbalanced phone saying its a balanced product for the customers ... :-)
people are saying the w910i has really bad specs, compared to other phones such as g600, lg viewty, n95 etc, but take a look at the price!
the specs on the n95 etc... might be far greater, although the price for these phones out there you could probably literally go and spend that money on a top of the range laptop or something!
WHY WHY WHYYYYHYHYHYHYHYYYYYYYYYYYY!
dude...you need to see reality more
SE W910i won becuase it is user friendly and has a balance of features
its not always Nokia you know
theres other Phone companies to !!!!!!!!!!
I think they should have just given it to SAGEM my850c,to settle this nonsense
hey NOKIA fanboy.... just go to NOKIA's page if you don't like w910i!!!! it's impossible that the judges make a mistake... N95 is good but it is not user friendly and fast like w910i... so the judges didn't need a powerfull phone but so unuser friendly and very like to freeze and hang!!!!
@ swordliger -
hey man people dont actually say n 95 is the best to be awarded they are saying that its better than this w 910 crap ... they are saying that there are more phones that offers balanced options than the w910 , and w910 is nothing compared to those phones even u can find some under the same walkman label and people dont even buy this crap phone the main reason for that is the heavy prize tag which is very very bad for this kind of a phone ... the judges who took this decision are so stupid that they even havent used a walkman phone or a nokia phone ... get a life stupid judges this is the worst decision about mobiles someone have ever made ... maybe s.e. paid em who knows ... im not getting paid by nokia to tell u the truth its that i cant stand lairs like these poeple who gave an award for this kind of phone ...
i actually have a SE w910i...and im still using it ever since the very first day i got it (november 2007)...and to be honest im really happy with it, never experienced a single problem.
many of you i see argue that N95 is alot better than W910i....but if you think about it, the amount of critisism the N95 have had was alot more than the critisisms that W910i had.
and besides...how much did N95 cost when it came out? the price was even more than the Nokia 8800 when it appeared in the market. W910i was alot cheaper than N95...and still is. those judges also have to consider the price tags on these phones as it affects the market greatly, thus increasing the phone's popularity.
so in conclusion, i believe we cannot put the w910i and the N95 in comparison, their basically different classes.
W910i deserved it.
terrible decision. phone is riddle with problems and is a flimsy handset....
The w910 SUCKS!!! It doesn't even have a flash for the camera!! How can it be an all rounder phone???? LMFAO
microdude, it won because its way more practical and more people friendly than the stuff you listed.
SE W910 won the award? That stupid phone with a heavy price tag and old flash-less 2 MP camera? Who would want to buy the W910? K850, W960, N81 and N96 are so much better. Even the Viewty is a great phone.
i like to agree on the n95 capabality, but maybe n95 is categorize as the best smartphone not normal handphone
I agree with others here, I personally think Sony Ericsson products are fantastic but surely the N95 has to take the honours for 2007!
hi dani ok w910 very good ,thank you for this letter special sony ericsson w910 ,
N95 is way better than w910, otherwise the w910 do all the things that is meant to do very well. Indeed its a good phone, that do a couple things very well.
But the n95 own my heart.
well N95 Classic is worse then W910i when it comes to problems
Symbian = Freezing/Crashing
Symbian N95 Classic = bad battery life!
User Friendlyness = SE Java OS !
Best Battery Life = SE Java OS
Nokia fans please do some research before speaking total Crap.........
like this person below me LOOOL thats all crap