Awesome!! Let's hope they don't waste time with wireless charger! Also, a company that realizes plastic is by far the better choice, no fragile heavy glass!!! Great work google!!
This is a good phone for google fans and a great phone for google and android users.
All bugs in Android are usually corrected by pixel users for a better versions for samsung and other android phones.
essentially Premium Beta Testing Devices.
AnonD-804996, 04 Sep 2020What's with all the flagship killers suddenly using crappy mid end chipsets all of a sudden?Blaming qualcomm will be better for it, in 2019 sd 855 costed about 50 usd, this year sd 865 costs about 150 usd, this insanity, then jow can one expect these type of chipsets in a sub 400 usd phone?
AnonD-804996, 04 Sep 2020What's with all the flagship killers suddenly using crappy mid end chipsets all of a sudden?Because 99% of mobile users have no idea what a high end chip is versus mid-range. Only the spec nerds really care about that stuff. Most people care about the camera, people able to store a lot of photos and fast internet.
Other than that...cost savings to the phone manufacturer. If the chip manufacturer says it cost X for the brand new high end chip...and it costs X Minus 40% for the mid-range chip...and 99% of your users don't have any idea of the difference...which would you use if you were a manufacturer
AnonD-804996, 04 Sep 2020What's with all the flagship killers suddenly using crappy mid end chipsets all of a sudden?The high-end chipsets cost too much now, QC have put their prices up.
Pixel 4a is the phone for me 😍
Simple, compact and clean.
Still no info about india launch,
that's sad 😐
People were happy with Pixel 4a pricing (350$). Now, Pixel 5 priced at 630$ should have IP rating, 90Hz screen, larger battery, 5g support, better processor, UW camera and everybody is crying because of price. Hardware upgrades are not for free.
630€ for midrange device , what are smoking google ? Snapdragon 765 , plastic build , and no ultrawide camera and i thought they would be serious this year and present some competitive devices but nothing changed
Google , you should stop making smartphones if you insist on failure
Could be a great deal if there isn't any bugs, since the camera software is so good, if there is an ultrawide + a telephoto, IP ratong and wireless charging this could be a great competitor in the US and in the Europe
What's with all the flagship killers suddenly using crappy mid end chipsets all of a sudden?
All plastic magic going to fight Nord which has much better spec
"So, the only thing that is (probably) missing is the 90 Hz refresh rate for the display."
And wireless charging, premium build quality, IP rating. Maybe more.
600+ euro for a beta phone? What are they smoking at Google? It's not worth more than 250 euro, since the users needs to help correcting flaws that should have been fixed before launch. And for that reason, it is a fully launched beta phone.