Anonymous, 24 Sep 2020usb c is worst than 3.5mm no doubt . This a common knowledge. How dare you think usb c audio i... moreUSB Audio is better than 3.5mm any day.
Smartphone users have been seeing this couple of years.
We(computer user/part time gamers) have been appreciating the USB audio since a long time.
The problem now was the market is short for USB C type headphones. But I think that's not a problem now.
Spanky, 24 Sep 2020That makes sense. Just like OEMs have started releasing Ultra versions of flagships, chip manu... moreMediaTek might not have access to the Cortex X1 core. So, I'm guessing this strategy is not going to happen with MediaTek.
AnonD-909757, 24 Sep 2020First, you are overestimating greatly the importance of the front facing camera.
Second, ther... moreLooks like you're smarter than the Engineers that Samsung or Apple have.
Or you're just an arrogant stupid who thinks he outsmarts everyone.
I think this is the third time we're having this type of conversation.
Somehow you always come up with stupid ideas that none cares about.
First you wanted ultra fast lens with big sensors. Which was impractical and useless in most condition.
Then you wanted to use High resolution ToF with tiny laser beam and said Apple's LiDAR splits light in the middle of it's way.
Now with this new idea ?
Clearly these prove that your physics is very weak. That translates you're not an Engineer. So, why're you even doing this ?
M3S4, 24 Sep 2020Your camera solution wont be great. You might want get higher education to understand how phys... moreOr maybe you lack imagination and don't have enough visual thinking skills to understand what I meant or how it would work, because I can clearly guarantee you there are several ways to implement what I wrote about without any quality issues.
USB can have great audio quality, the USB to Jack dongle often doesn't provide that and cause many issues, and well, pro audio headset are still choosing Jack over USB, same for guitar mainly and many other instruments.
Huawei were doing unique phones, Samsung are doing the same as everybody else, that's one difference, I am not a Huawei fanboy, I just don't like Samsung behavior, that's a huge difference.
Huawei didn't enforced one SoC into a market despite making a better option for another market, I never said anything about Huawei camera and I don't know more about it than peoples saying it is good for both, I never tried any of the two UI and I never complained about the cost of modern smartphones, I even clearly stated multiple times that to get the special features I wish I'd be ready to pay extra, unlike peoples who want everything for extremely low cost.
AnonD-754814, 24 Sep 2020Front camera is a primary necessity. You can't just exclude that. One person might not us... moreFirst, you are overestimating greatly the importance of the front facing camera.
Second, there are way more peoples than you seem to be aware of that would love phones without front camera.
And thirdly, there are better solutions than a tiny and low quality camera getting constantly in the way of the display in a way on another, solution including non-intrusive, user friendly way to use both main camera and display at the same time, allowing many advantages.
AnonD-955101, 24 Sep 2020Again, bringing your get rid of that useless, without purpose selfie camera nonsense on a non ... moreAnd I am just getting started 😁
Literally I do so much things at once on my computer that it doesn't waste a single minute on my day, and just to see you complaining, this is priceless, I could keep going like that for months !
AnonD-955101, 24 Sep 2020Somebody called me? 😂 Yes, I was mentioning how useless and annoying you were, your troll mind did the rest and summoned you.
AnonD-754814, 24 Sep 2020This test result is very confusing. A SoC crossing 1000 points mark for single core performa... moreThat makes sense. Just like OEMs have started releasing Ultra versions of flagships, chip manufacturers might do it too. Releasing a „regular“ successor to the 865 (at a similar price), then have the premium SoC (with the X1 core), for the 1500+ euros flagships. MTK would follow suit with branching the next high-end Dimensity chips.
M3S4, 24 Sep 2020Your camera solution wont be great. You might want get higher education to understand how phys... moreusb c is worst than 3.5mm no doubt . This a common knowledge. How dare you think usb c audio is superior. Dunning kurger
S21 mini or or S21 mini+ or S21 mini pro or S21 mini pro max or S21 mini pro max+ or S21 FE or S21 Lite or S21 Neo or S21 SE
versus, 24 Sep 2020in 2030 will be s30 ;) 🤣
AnonD-909757, 24 Sep 2020I can't see S21 as an elegant name.
I literally explained in the previous comment that... moreYour camera solution wont be great. You might want get higher education to understand how physically hard to make thing like you said with quality.
How dare you think usb c deliver worse than 3.5 mm jack in term of audio quality? Usb c can deliver perfect bit data to DAC (with custom driver from usb audio player), without external dac, usb c can also deliver same power level as 3.5mm jack. 3.5mm jack advantage is convenience and popularity. No other than that.
And huawei is same as samsung tho. Huawei have their own kirin same as exynos . Huawei have great camera same as samsung. Huawei have emui sama as one ui samsung. Huawei pricing same as Samsung. You are just Huawei fanboy.
Of course Exynos markets are gonne be scammed again
Did you really expected the Exynos cheap to better or even just on par with S875 ?
Think again, friend
AnonD-909757, 24 Sep 2020No permanant front camera doesn't mean no solutions, there are many, from Zenfone 6, 7, 7... moreFront camera is a primary necessity. You can't just exclude that. One person might not use the camera to take selfie(like me) but it is used in many other cases.
This test result is very confusing.
A SoC crossing 1000 points mark for single core performance and using base Cortex A55 core at 2.2GHz then the Multi core score should be at least 3800.
Or it is using mongoose M6 custom core with old cortex A77 like they're used to do ?
Using custom core is kinda impossible now.
Also this SoC is not going to compete against SD875 SoC. Qualcomm is said to have A flagship SoC without cortex X1 core.
I'm guessing SD875(X1 core) and Exynos 1000(X1 core) are reserved for S21 ultra only.
Because I believe this time Both Exynos/SD top flagship SoC full set will touch 200$ mark, give or take 10$.
Might be the romered Exynos 992 that is maybe gonna be used on the S21 and S21+. Or it is a 4G version of the Exynos 1000. Worst case the Exynos 1000 is delayed for the AMD graphics.
AnonD-909757, 24 Sep 2020Are we sure it will be called the S21 and not the S30 ?
S10, S20 and S30 seem more logic than... moreAgain, bringing your get rid of that useless, without purpose selfie camera nonsense on a non related topic.
I think, this 2100 would be for the 4G variant... while the 5G variant gets the Exynos 1000
Who knows..? Samsung may not even use Snapdragon for the S21 line up