Android.Master, 29 Sep 2020mAh/min doesn't matter if competing phones have bigger batteries.
Samsung for example ma... moreyet losses on battery endurance for ampere ratio to xperia and iphone?
why settle for less mah?
why get a higher mah when a lower one gets higher endurance that those having higher mah?
choose your poison. gsmarena publishes battery endurance rating and proven that higher mah doesnt always result to higher endurance...
educate yourself first...
Two things I couldn't care less about. I never use my phone on full brightness. And I am not a 12 - 25 year taking selfies that then just get a stupid filter put over the top and passed through trash apps with poor compression like FB and Snapchat....
New OnePlus User, 28 Sep 2020Remember SONY is still trying to play catch-up with over heating issues.Afcourse it will overheat as Sony has cheapened out on cooling despite pricing it 1200 Euros.
Anonymous, 28 Sep 2020I watched a test that OP8 Pro and Find X2 Pro uses more mAh/min than Xperia 1ii , despite much... moremAh/min doesn't matter if competing phones have bigger batteries.
Samsung for example makes up for the higher consumption in terms of mAh/min with bigger battery size.
vrvly, 28 Sep 2020Well, try compare the details in tool, its basically 8mp vs 32mp, in s20/s20+/note20 is 8K as ... moreAre you joking ? 8k in galaxy is just gimmick try to compare it with their 4k videos and the latter is better
Give me something good to use not some useless feature that company will use it to hike the price
Anonymous, 28 Sep 20201) because to be 4K you consider 3840 not the 2160. 2) 5040 x 2160 is exaclty 2:33:1 , bi... moreThank you for the informative post. You are right, and I've been ignorant to the approximate 4000 pixels horizontally. I stand corrected :)
Alex, 28 Sep 2020I'm not even sure why GSMarena insists on calling the X1II's display 4k. It's n... more1) because to be 4K you consider 3840 not the 2160.
2) 5040 x 2160 is exaclty 2:33:1 , bit it's 5K already
3) 4K 21:9 used by cinematography industry is cropped, actually it is 2,37:1 . Which would be less pixels than this screen
4) you would not be able to play 4K video on it
Videocameras mostly used by industry to record up to 4K have between 8,5 - 12MP with same 3:2 sensor like photo cameras. This because lower MP increases readout speed consequently less rolling shutter for videos.
This way to record 21:9, the top and bottom are cropped because there are not enough horizontal pixels to use, since 16:9 already uses whole sensor horizontally.
Anonymous, 28 Sep 2020Thank you gsm arena for telling me right away about the main sensor,i am no more into sony phones,Which one is pathetic? If it's the main camera, you're delusional at the best, if it's the IMX557's 12 MP 1.8μm 1/1.7" 24 mm is lackluster when it's not, considering there some flagship using much lower sensor than IMX 557 and one of biggest pixel pitch camera sensor on non-Quad Bayer type to exist since Nokia Lumia days. If it's the selfie camera, well, I admit that, they should give better specs on 1 III, either brighther aperture or better sensor.
Alex, 28 Sep 2020I'm not even sure why GSMarena insists on calling the X1II's display 4k. It's n... more4K is used as approximate resolution, more precisely it should be one with around 4000 pixels in horizontal line which is right in this case.
Some use more, some less in horizontal line, some less in vertical, may be confusing then, but its definitely easier to present than some phase many don't get.
Xperian, 28 Sep 2020Sony please make simpler practical phone like Xperia 10 ii design with better processor sd765g... moreYou want a midrange phone with a 48MP 1/1.4" sensor that is also exclusively made for BBK?
If Sony had any interest in Snapdragon 7xx series, they would be using already.
10iii will probably be 690.
They have zero interest in segment between $450 - 800...
putraws, 28 Sep 2020sony listen!
im big fans of sony phones.
my xperia s still working fine to this day.
but ... more1) turn on HDR. If DR was that weak, not even HDR would solve the issue.
2) set shutter 3s + ISO400 , done
3) other abuse sharpening, sony does not
4) you are asking as camera manufacturer to give fake results? That's pathetic ..
* 1ii already uses 120Hz hardware. You cannot use 4K@120 because of CPU cannot handle.
* stainless is way more expensive. Also since XZ3, Sony uses frame 200% stronger than alluminum according to them. Stainless is much heavier.
* mark iii will have more battery, for sure
Firefox, 28 Sep 20205000 Amp Battary? It took Sony so many years to increase from 3500 Amp to 4000 Amp only in 202... moreI watched a test that OP8 Pro and Find X2 Pro uses more mAh/min than Xperia 1ii , despite much lower screen resolution.
Also both were at higher temperature.
Nothing New, 28 Sep 2020manufacturers still didn't perfect 4k let alone 8k which is useless if you are going to g... moreWell, try compare the details in tool, its basically 8mp vs 32mp, in s20/s20+/note20 is 8K as it should since it got enough of pixels with regular bayer. It looks even better than stills, just what kind of perfection you want... 120 hdr? its better to have something than nothing.
Even latest sony mirrorless cameras lack 8K, certainly its useless to those who do not record video or use camera while holding phone vertical, bet no screen with reasonable price got enough pixels to show that in this world yet or in near future lol.
I'm not even sure why GSMarena insists on calling the X1II's display 4k. It's not. The only real 4k resolution is 3840x2160, full stop. The one found on the Xperia XZ Premium. The Xperia 1II uses 3840x1644 which is most assuredly below 4k. Yes, I know it's because it's 21:9. But I'll give you an exercise. Go to LG, Dell and ViewSonic websites and search for 21:9 PC monitors with the same resolution as the X1II (3840x1650), and you will discover that all 3 of these brands are saying the monitor is WQHD+, not 4k. Now, I'm sure they would love to be able to say 4k, but I'm also sure they know that PC enthusiasts would call them out on that, so they don't' do it, because it's not 4k. The Xperia 1 II is WQHD+. And, it doesn't even display that resolution all the time. It only does it when the phone is streaming 21:9 high definition video from Netflix, etc. During normal use, the phone uses the same resolution as the Xperia 5II (2560x1080) which is WFHD+, in order to save battery. What does that mean? That the Xperia 1 II could have easily offered 120hz refresh rate in normal use, given that it doesn't even use that fancy maximum resolution outside of media playback. But if they did that, Sony couldn't have slapped that "4k" label on it anymore, because it just doesn't add up. So yeah, I doubt the Xperia 1 III will come with a real 4k display, unless they give up on the 21:9 aspect ratio, and go back to 16:9.
Sony has made many things right with Mark 2. But 4000 batterry and 8gb ram is not the specs for 1300. At this price I expect 5000mah 12gb ram and 5 camera