It’s not mate 40 pro gsmarena it’s mate 40 pro plus there’s a different between w phones.
JDK, 25 Oct 2020LoL do you have proof that better hardware specs means better camera?
And if you don't... more"do you have proof that better hardware specs means better camera?"
I know this comment is nearly 1 month old, but let me ask you this: Have you ever used a dedicated camera before? If so then that should naturally answer your question. Software is a part of an equation but hardware also plays a significant part in ALL cameras' image quality.
Biggest bummer is not the lack of GMS, but the poor screen even for 2020 not mentioning 2021. No qHD+, no 1 billion colors, no 120hz refresh rate! I got all of those in my x2 pro and trust me when I put it next to my wife's p40pro it is like night and day (and both phones cost the same including the fact the p40pro has no GMS)! That talks a lot for mate40 series too since they have same as p40pro screen just 0.2" bigger!
Anonymous, 25 Oct 2020Yeah everyone can see that they rank iphones with low scores there. And everyone can see that ... moreLoL do you have proof that better hardware specs means better camera?
And if you don't and never will spend money on a huawei phone, how will you ever know how good the camera performs?
DroidBois are getting increasingly dumb these days.
Anonymous, 25 Oct 2020Yeah everyone can see that they rank iphones with low scores there. And everyone can see that ... moreLoL did I mention anything about iPhones?
What has this got to do with iPhones?
Stop changing the conversation.
Or better yet, change your fanboism.
mandalaphone, 23 Oct 2020Impressive shots and dynamic range. Almost matches DSLR quality. Huawei has done it again.Where does it show the dynamic range scale of the mate 40 pro ?
All I read was the dynamic range is fairly wide , and some highlight clipping in some situations.
Dxo mark should come down. There is no.way any phone would be better for front facing camera then zenfone6/7 or pixel 3xl.
The video quality on the Zenfone matches top brands let alone selfie video and photo. Pixel on the other hand has best photography.
Huawei/damsung/apple are good but not that good.
JDK, 23 Oct 2020I don't like DxOmark.
Companies that don't use their algorithm get lower scores, ... moreYeah everyone can see that they rank iphones with low scores there. And everyone can see that hurts you feeling. But it is ok maybe some day they will realize that 12mp is not good enough. The pictures they use as comparison shows it all good enough.
Maybe some day apple will catch up with the better phones.
mandalaphone, 24 Oct 2020Unlike all other reviewers out there who do the work for charity! What does this even mean?I just want them to also join the others and work for charity, and maybe they will be fir in their reviews don't you think?
Lukhanyo, 24 Oct 2020Facts, and facts.. These websites get paid Unlike all other reviewers out there who do the work for charity! What does this even mean?
MrHong, 24 Oct 2020True. I can easily fake up shots with DSLR camera. Huawei has been caught using DSLR camera sh... moreIf you think more, you know that they are testing the actual handset when reviewing its camera
If one looks at Huawei camera hardware which is constantly at the forefront of camera tech, why is one surprise it gets top marks in reviews?
BTW, I would love to see GSM go into more detail on the free-form lens used in Huawei ultrawide.
MeZoP, 23 Oct 2020You do know the company was founded in paris right? I don't see any evidence about it bei... morenow it's Chinese-owned and surprise, surprise, all Chinese phones are leaders in cameras when other reviews say otherwise :) (same situation with Antutu)
JDK, 23 Oct 2020I don't like DxOmark. Companies that don't use their algorithm get lower scores, ... moreWhile I agree that the Mate 40 does have some of the best cameras on the market, but yeah, DxOMark is to be taken with some grain of salt. I prefer GsmA, Android Authority, or YouTube channels such as TechTablets to do their work.
Lukhanyo, 24 Oct 2020Facts, and facts.. These websites get paid True. I can easily fake up shots with DSLR camera. Huawei has been caught using DSLR camera shots for one of its advertisement in the past.
MeZoP, 23 Oct 2020You do know the company was founded in paris right? I don't see any evidence about it bei... moreso what? it's of no importance WHERE the company was founded but with WHOSE money was founded and with WHOSE money keeps functioning. to purchase and maintain all the equipment dxo claims is using, and to run a web site with no clear sources of income, considering the small amount of advertising you see there, means a VERY serious subsidizing source. the simple fact the site works in english and alternatively only in chinese, although is "founded in paris" :) speaks volumes...
JDK, 24 Oct 2020what did I say about android that was "bad"? Have you seen me say "so glad t... moreYes, DxOMark deserves criticism. But DxOMark and gsmarena.com are PROBABLY marketing partners. I have zero trust on DxOMark's dubious camera rating system. DxOMark's collaboration with phone makers is clearly at work here. Coming up with complete camera lab test results just a few days after a phone is announced! That's clear evidence of testing 'sponsorship' and fishy collaboration. Just too much conflict of interest. Huawei and other phone manufacturers also sponsor gsmarena.com reviews but at least gsmarena.com tempers their biases to the sponsors in their reviews and there's no 'magical' rating at the end of the review that puts an OVERALL benchmark score of the phone as compared to others.
MeZoP, 23 Oct 2020Lol funny your saying that. Because it really seems like your defending IOS all the way huh???... morewhat did I say about android that was "bad"?
Have you seen me say "so glad to be a part of the suppperrrior OS of IOS"? No.
Have I said "android ussssersss are peeeeaaasants begging for stuff"? No.
You see, I'm not trashing either one, both are good choices.
I'm just critisizing DxOmark.