like they say,if you cant fight them then bite them.apple cannot stand a chance against samsung anymore.the s3 is a pain in apples butt and apple cant get it out.apple new that even a iphone5,6,7or even iphone 10 where to be made,they cant defeat a galaxy.so there is one solution left for apple,to use cheating trick in this battel like lying they invated the curve corner,touch and retina display.i love apple gadgets but on their battle with samsung i wil not take their side.sory
it is common sense that the US judge will be in favor to the US BASED company after all how else on earth would justice be served ??
Ray, 01 Aug 2012don't u c the pix 4 the new I phone concept in the news. same as satioYou mean the concept pics from 2005? Now you're really stretching it.
only apple,only motorola,only united states...
no lg,no samsung,no korea...
Good judgement comes from experience, and experience comes from poor judgement.
The Candy industry should get to should file a class sue on the mobile phone industry.
Coz, todays phones are all design copies of chocolate bars.
Anonymous, 01 Aug 2012they can be patented indeed!! because before iphone, touchscreens mobiles like nokia 7710 were... moreAs much a I might agree, this case is not about all those patents.
Also the judge isn't allowing the Sony evidence becasue it's immaterial to this case - Apple is suing Samesung for allegedly copying them. If Samsung wants to take Apple to task over copying Sony then that's a different case. I get that Samsung is trying to use this to cast doubt on Apples legitimacy in what it says and as such the judge probably should allow the argument (or at least some of it) - however shé can arguably justify the claim that's its immaterial to the specific case at hand.
Sorry Samsung - please don't remotely make my S3 heat up & melt! For what it's worth I think the whole thing should get throun out of court.
Excuse me, for those who are saying that Apple copied the "Satio" First, look at the year it is released. Second, LG is again around the corner "LG KU990 Viewty" which also looks like the "LG Prada" which is the only phone that will convince me that Apple really is a copycat(design-wise). C'mon, it's so obvious that Samsung copied the iPhone's design.
Think of this, Samsung is saying that they don't copy the design. OK, Galaxy SIII is safe because it is a tad different on how the iPhone looks but more of Nokia C7/701, HAHA.! Next, if you really are proud of the style/design of your product, why don't they brag it like its the best like "this is the designer of this..." "its design is inspired by the designer's..."
But they don't have that right? Also, news will make way for it starting from the people's praises for it. Look at Nokia N9. Get it?
they only say "Designed for humans" WHAT THE? Of course! Are you designing a phone for animals? Ok I'm being sarcastic there.
Anyway back to the news, Samsung can't escape from this because something is so obvious. I'm not wishing them good-luck because i hate copycats. I'm not an Apple fanboy nor Samsung super hater, I just hate their GALAXIES save for the Nexus which is beautiful. I'm a certified Nokianatic but not to the point that "I want it just because it's Nokia"--> that's pathetic.
That's all I can say. I don't care 'bout the Samsung fanboys that will attack my comment sooner than later(just in case), this is my opinion. :P
Currently samsung is the most successful smartphone manufacturer and seller, it would not have been able to achieve this position if it had copied any design. People wouldn't be spending $800 on gs3 if it had anything copied. They are not fools, that they buy something copied even after spending so much......
rajesh, 01 Aug 2012i cant understand why people like iphone that much. People dont like design only like performa... moreDude your expectations are way bad because of current tech.
Why ? its simple.
"only andriod can support quad core processor and 2gb ram larger display"
Unfortunate thing is android OEMs mess with GPUs and Android , finally make a junk phone as a result + no apps support quad core.Not even single app exists.Even apps supporting Dual Core are pretty less tbh.
Even though phone is locked , RAM needs to be refreshed constantly which means more RAM = less standby time and bigger battery for carrying out processors + large screen consume heavy power which ultimately leads to an average phone once u use it daily and see unless battery is big , not to forget inefficient things which overheat the phones to higher temperatures.
"People dont like design only like performance too. So by todays specs wise apple is mid range phone comparing too andriod phones not only samsung other companies too have highend phones"
Once check how good 10 months iPhone holding up against 2-3 months old devices and also check iPad once.
Apple may not push good CPU but their GPU's rock :
Anonymous, 01 Aug 2012they can be patented indeed!! because before iphone, touchscreens mobiles like nokia 7710 were... moreThat's being a bit one sided.
What has contributed to the the company Apple Inc. is that they usually are the FIRST TO COMMERCIALIZE a type(s) of technology(ies)
Apple then goes on to secure their lead in the respective markets by patenting something THEY DID NOT FIRST COME UP WITH, apple didn't INVENT the touchscreen so why try to patent it?
As for visual and software experience, apple claims samsung copied a lot of that from them which may or may not be true, whatever the case may be some things are just generic in nature...a sneaker will look like a sneaker, a phone will look like a phone so what? If someone "copied" their idea then if they are half as imaginative as they claim to be why don't they just come up with something better instead of bickering with a rival they know will overshadow them in sales cause they come up with nothing better than what they had before?
Anonymous, 01 Aug 2012shame on you shamesung! their designs are ugly, even their tvs are ugly! I'm no apple fanboy, ... moreEH HMM... your saying they copy the home screen button but then point out they make it look different thats not copying then is it. thats like saying the s3 copies the iphone design but they changed the curves and size and screen... there is only so many things a company can do to change looks in this industry
[deleted post]Lol lol lol
super lol.. agreed dude
you make my day droid lovers here..
Jasveen, 01 Aug 2012Interesting I don't like Apple's way of suing everything. But they did revolutionize the touch... moreApple did no invent the capacitive touch screen. They where the first to make use of it but never owned the technology.
I don't think Apple has the right to the design. Almost all cellphone designs, from the the first ones are in some form of a rectangular shaped. Its a design which was most ergonomic, which allows the user to easily hold, talk and listen on one singular device. But i do give them a thumb ups for integrating touch screen, and other tech into such a small form factor, and revolutionizing the phone into the smartphone we have today.
Interesting I don't like Apple's way of suing everything. But they did revolutionize the touchscreen phone technology.
OH no, now apple is copying sony erricson mobiles. Look at new apply phone it is copy of Sony erricson K600, T610 and many like them.
Oh no i am ashamed to say that i use apple. Never again for ever. Copy cat company and then accusing others of steeling patents.
I hate u apple for doing this.
i cant understand why people like iphone that much. People dont like design only like performance too. So by todays specs wise apple is mid range phone comparing too andriod phones not only samsung other companies too have highend phones because only andriod can support quad core processor and 2gb ram larger display