just look @ d stupid hole
Design wise though and of all OEMs, LG to me is harder to be y'know let slide off because they're not your garden variety new to the block droid OEM. I don't like ZTE for example but at least they try harder with an under display front cam. What the hell are all other brands are doing? While Samsung's Infinity O solution is 1 of the more minimally invasive approach, it's just lazy to keep copping off their style. Not just LG to be fair but also others.
This shit needs to stop tbh...
Another plasticky phone from LG.
And that punch hole is huge.
I love the back design
Kriegsherr, 29 Oct 2020This is why LG can't sell much. They are one of the leading manufacturers of OLED panels ... moreSamsung doesn't use OLED, they use Amoled which is a knock off tech - doesn't even use self lighting pixels , it uses diffuser sheets to move light/colour.
Blogietis, 29 Oct 2020In general this looks like a very promising device and especially I like how it looks, nice jo... moreTechnically the velvet is classified as a mid range device and it is IP68. K series devices are technically entry level and no other OEMs that's sold in retail phone stores have mid range or entry level phones with IP rating, with maybe the exception of the pixel but that's more on Velvet level than K92
In general this looks like a very promising device and especially I like how it looks, nice job by LG but I have some gripes with it (I hoped to see an IP rating on an LG midranger by now and a better ultrawide angle lens... seems like they should have ditched those other cameras and just brought a better ultrawide)
Kriegsherr, 29 Oct 2020This is why LG can't sell much. They are one of the leading manufacturers of OLED panels ... moreAs long as it's a good LCD panel it should be fine, at least there won't be burn in like with an OLED
The rear of the phone would look 10x better if LG made their logo less tacky and didn't have an AT&T logo. And if that one camera didn't stick out.
Oh and why on Earth does LG think this phone is a good idea? That price is abysmal. Doesn't even have an OLED, let alone a high refresh rate display, only a mediocre battery, slow charging, a trash camera setup, and the slow SD690. The 765G would be horrible at this price, and they're slapping an even slower SD690 in it? Why? It's priced $160 higher than it should be. Literally worse than the $200 Realme 7.
No art in the rear cameras design, bo good
This is why LG can't sell much. They are one of the leading manufacturers of OLED panels but this phone has a LCD. Just an OLED panel would make it a good value for money device. Samsung understood this and including OLED in their entry level phones and everyone saw the result.
Anonymous, 29 Oct 2020I really hope the hole-punch doesnt actually look like that.Yeah it looks like the eye of Mike Wazowski.
Anders, 29 Oct 2020Only a 4,000mah battery for s 6.7" display??? It's stupid crap like this why no one... moreAre you forgetting the part where its using a midrange processor that doesn't need a huge battery?
LG just got the specs and the pricing right with this one. Might turn into the LG cash cow
That rear design looks like it came straight from 7 years ago.
Though I'm believing this might boost LG sales a lil bit
Anders, 29 Oct 2020Only a 4,000mah battery for s 6.7" display??? It's stupid crap like this why no one... moreSometimes is resolution rather than size what makes a display power hungry, let's wait for the tests
That design is so gorgeous!! I just hope they do something like this available world wide
What's with these crapoy 2mp "Macro" cameras, whos doing so much macro with a phone that we need that over a quality 3x 🙄