AnonD-763241, 02 Nov 2020According to gsmarena....read iphone 12 reviewNice joke
AnonD-945200, 02 Nov 2020so there is no ways to measure benchmarks other than these chinese apps ????
Of course there is.
3DMark now has the best unfiltered unbiased metrics tool for all smartphones.
and as usual samsung exynos beat snapdragon in benchmark ..when come to cpu throtling test..
This means absolutely nothing and here are my reasons:
1. There will be no difference in real life scenarios
2. The Chances of the Snapdragon having better 5G than the Kirin is ZERO
So even if the performance is better by that little the 5G real life speed will make up for more than that
Anonymous, 02 Nov 2020Slower than a14 according to who?According to gsmarena....read iphone 12 review
My dad is stronger then your dad.... Blaahhhh.
All chips are pretty strong nowadays, how much stronger do we need them??
I'm satisfied with my Mate 20X, the power in it and especially the battery power 💪🏻
danggggggg its will destroy the a14 and the exynos 1080 at speed tests
can´t wait to see the benchmark scores
AnonD-763241, 02 Nov 2020Sd 875 is only slightly faster than Kirin 9000 which is very much slower than a14...sd 875 wil... moreNo, it will surpass the A14 as in cpu as in gpu. The 875 has custom cores which the prime core will be a X1 core and the other high performance cores will be A78 cores.The 875 gpu is stronger than the Kirin 9000 one. The tests of these benchmarks are not reliable. Chinese benchmarks, huh!....
so there is no ways to measure benchmarks other than these chinese apps ????
I appreciate more competition in SOC market. If they can provide almost equal level of performance for less price, I think it's a win win situation for consumers.
I Wish people would stop comparing Apple Chips With Android. Apple design their chips to a closed eco system so not even comparable.
Just more burning up Galaxy phones that the user can't touch after 10-minutes from using its 4K video recording, playing games, 5G, etc.
Develop much better battery technology / power source, energy efficient displays that reduces 60% of power consumption that does not effect performance, smarter / AI cores, etc.
Folks... Honestly. The A14 is slower once 10 mins into a game... Slower than the 865 and 865+ due to sensitive throttling issues and no cooling... No surprise... According to geek bench multi core scores... Once the A14 throttles. It's multi core scores produce something around 2,900.
As a gamer. I wouldnt go for anything other than mediatek, kirin, Qualcomm, or this coming exynos...
A14 is way overhyped... And severely let down even more than the A13. Which octually outperforms some areas of the A14... Even an 855+ is a good match for the A13... And the 865 and 865+ in a gaming phone with cooling is by far the better option than an A14 any day.
Besides Apple have a considerably unbalanced and most inefficient handset to date.
Realistically speaking. The 875 is going to pretty much slaughter the A14 and turn it into sushi.